Scunge wrote:
People on this forum just aren't buying unfortunately. They are sold on the Dick LeBeau 3-4 defense, think it is just fine, love the flexibility that it gives you, blah, blah, blah.
Oh, it is flexible all right, it gives opposing teams so much flexibility in destroying your defense. That dagger to the heart in Sunday's game, the long 45 yard pass play to Keenan Cole, burning Artie Burns, was another one of those old, reliable LeBeau weaknesses of a 3-4 defense. That play has killed us so many times over the years and the Jags dialed it up when they needed it to get the 14 point lead again.
I hear so many excuses of why we can't switch to a 4-3, and they are all lame and feeble. It is possible to find 3 and even 4 players in a given year.
In 2016 we got Burns, Davis and Hargrave.
In 2017 we got Watt, Sutton and Allen in the draft and Hilton, Haden and Alualu as free agents.
This past year we added 6 players through the draft and free agency. This team moved on from Harrison, is about ready to cut Willie Gay. Art Moats will not be brought back, Mike Mitchell and JJ Wilcox will give this team over $8 million in cap savings and should both be cut as well.
This team, finally, is rid of any players with deep ties to LeBeau, there are no vets left. It is a blank slate, the switch to a 4-3 won't get any better than right now.
I honestly believe that we could draft 3 players and pursue two more Alualu type of free agents and make the switch. I also agree with some of your assertions that they were starting to go in the 4-3 direction. Using Heyward as your primary pass rusher, as the focal point of your pass rush, dropping your OLBs into coverage more than ever before, not blitzing as much, starting to explore man to man concepts when Haden was healthy and playing.
All of that sure looked like they were trending towards a 4-3 to me. The thing for me is that they have a young team now, and trying to maintain this 3-4 base, the old 3-4 Dick LeBeau AND also do these new 4-3 looks is just counterproductive, it is just confusing. Better to just move on to the 4-3 full-time as the base defense and simplify things for everybody.
My signature shows you what I think of Watt, I think he could be the MLB, say he is our Brian Urlacher now in the middle of the field. Unlike Williams, he truly has the speed to go sideline to sideline and he also is just naturally gifted in pass coverage. Yeah, if you keep Bud Dupree at OLB he could be like Anthony Barr in Minnesota who plays their Sam linebacker. If you went that route you only need to find a weak side 'Will' outside linebacker, a Telvin Smith type, smaller, faster, usually a former safety in college. Every draft has these players, we could find one in round 2 or 3 this season, Telvin Smith was drafted by Jacksonville in round 5.
Yeah, I want to see Heyward and Hargrave play next to each other inside as the starting DTs and for both to play about 75% of the snaps with that 3rd DT coming in and spelling them and playing 50% of the snaps. I think you could see 25-30 sacks produced just from that trio inside. Tuitt has great size and length to really cause problems if you move him around at DE and line him up wide at times. I saw them do some of that this season but injuries really derailed some plans I think that they had in store for him.
I think we are so close, they just need to pull the trigger and make it happen.
I agree but also think Watt could play the Will linebacker anyway. Either way the whole thing does still rest on nabbing not one, but two real edge rushers to rotate with each other.
Ansah in FA and Hubbard IN THE 2nd could change this defense big time.
Then grab Daquan Jones for cheap in FA to back up Tuitt. Then draft a haystack 340lber in the 5th to assumre NT depth.
Ronnie Harrison in the 1st solidifies the safety position, and a 3rd rounder on a RB and 4th round a backup safety/LB type player.