steelerfury.com
http://www.steelerfury.com/forum/

AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Time"
http://www.steelerfury.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=9249
Page 2 of 5

Author:  Kodiak [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

SteelerChef wrote:
To be fair....a total bs call....BUT...that 2 pt call was worse...lol...i will take it...lol


I thought the elbow was clearly down before the ball broke the plain.

Maybe Tomlin is actually an evil genius that doesn't put teams away because he's just a company man.

Author:  Louis Lipps Service [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

Personally felt like it was the right call, but shouldn’t have been overturned due to how subjective it was.

Looked to me like AB was bobbling the ball most of the way through the catch. He had control for a brief second before the defender’s arm knocked it sideways again, but that’s not enough to establish possession.

Again, my opinion.

Author:  bam morris [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

SteelerChef wrote:
To be fair....a total bs call....BUT...that 2 pt call was worse...lol...i will take it...lol

I agree..i thought raven was in...I thought it must be make up call for the 3 points they shafted us on brown bs call.. how can these bums look at shit for 10 minites and still fuck it up 50 percet of time..

Author:  Steelafan77 [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

How come no one can be 100% sure of what is defined as a catch anymore? Was a horseshit call and unfortunately for the refs/nfl and the rats it didn't matter.

Author:  Kodiak [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

Steelafan77 wrote:
How come no one can be 100% sure of what is defined as a catch anymore? Was a horseshit call and unfortunately for the refs/nfl and the rats it didn't matter.


We all know what a catch is. Everyone has since they were 10 years old playing neighborhood games in your backyard.

But the rules allow the NFL to shape games in a way that keeps people watching. And I'll quit following it all when Ben retires.

Author:  TB [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Personally felt like it was the right call, but shouldn’t have been overturned due to how subjective it was.

Looked to me like AB was bobbling the ball most of the way through the catch. He had control for a brief second before the defender’s arm knocked it sideways again, but that’s not enough to establish possession.

Again, my opinion.


That’s where I’m at. I thought he was bobbling it prior to his knee hitting down. Still can’t believe they reversed the call on the field, but I understand it.

As for the two pointer, it looked like the left elbow hit down and before the ball crossed. He had the ball tucked back near his hip as he was going down. Tough call, but I think they got it right.

Author:  Kodiak [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

TB wrote:
Still can’t believe they reversed the call on the field


Yes to everything else, but especially that. THAT is everything. End of story.

Author:  bam morris [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

I thought neither justified over turn..and they wasted 20 min..but this is new nfl and its shit.

Author:  COR-TEN [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

Kodiak wrote:
SteelerChef wrote:
To be fair....a total bs call....BUT...that 2 pt call was worse...lol...i will take it...lol


I thought the elbow was clearly down before the ball broke the plain.

Maybe Tomlin is actually an evil genius that doesn't put teams away because he's just a company man.
Plane.

Author:  franco32 [ Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti

The "INT" was a joke. He had possession all the way until his knee hit. Just because the ball moves slightly as you have possession doesn't negate possession. It's not like there was a bobble.

The 2 point conversion was the right call. People were looking at his hip. If you look at elbow the ball was short.

Page 2 of 5 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/