It is currently Mon Nov 19, 2018 10:34 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
Seems to avoid contact like the plague especially on runs. What's his problem?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:12 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:20 am
Posts: 5487
Steelergenie wrote:
Seems to avoid contact like the plague especially on runs. What's his problem?

Contract #2 ?

_________________
"Tomlin doubled down on dumb" JackSplat58


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:20 am 
Total guess

Recurring shoulder injury


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
Not a good habit for a shut down corner. Brady will eat him up as Stafford did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:19 am
Posts: 9997
Steelergenie wrote:
Not a good habit for a shut down corner. Brady will eat him up as Stafford did.


I think Edelman ate his lunch more so even than Bray did.


_________________
Orangesteel wrote:
We could have ended the game there and Tomlin’s band of assholes let them back in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
Still Lit wrote:
Steelergenie wrote:
Not a good habit for a shut down corner. Brady will eat him up as Stafford did.


I think Edelman ate his lunch more so even than Bray did.



You are right. If we want to go to the SB, this needs to be fixed. Maybe start slowly working in Cam Sutton.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16585
You know he had 4 tackles vs the run on Sunday night, right?

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
Yeah, if you call being dragged for 8 yards making the tackle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:05 pm 
If a good to better CB can hang on while being dragged til the calvary gets there thats pretty good


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:50 am
Posts: 3075
bradshaw2ben wrote:
You know he had 4 tackles vs the run on Sunday night, right?

First four all season. That's the problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 6849
SP wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
You know he had 4 tackles vs the run on Sunday night, right?

First four all season. That's the problem.


But it's an improvement

He ain't no Artie Choke

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16585
I'm merely saying he didn't avoid contact this week, so either he's feeling better or someone coached him, or something.

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 895
A lot of people including myself have been calling for years for corners that cover first and tackle second.
Burns can cover, I’m good with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
He only makes the tackle when no one else is around and he's forced to do it. That's not going to cut it against superior teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:11 pm
Posts: 1519
cop1211 wrote:
A lot of people including myself have been calling for years for corners that cover first and tackle second.
Burns can cover, I’m good with that.


You're wrong. I want a leather helmet, sweater wearing, 1940's Grabowski that can break ribs, lost his nose in the war and runs a 5.4 40.

No...I'm wrong. Fuck Colbert for not drafting one, but TWO Rod Woodsons in the last 3 years.

No no...it's all wrong...bring back Cockrell and bench Burns. Ross could tackle the shit out guys between torchings.

_________________

Ultimately, America's answer to the intolerant man is diversity, the very diversity which our heritage of religious freedom has inspired.


Robert F. Kennedy...50 years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
What's so unusual about covering the pass and tackling? If the pass is completed, you still have to tackle or stop the run. Elite QB's will pick him apart.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 11752
ChicagoSteel wrote:
Fuck Colbert for not drafting one, but TWO Rod Woodsons in the last 3 years.


?? :shock: ??

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1952
I am disappointed in Burns this year. I expected a big jump from his rookie year to year two. I don't see it.

Everybody was so down on Ross Cockrell, calling him soft, can't play the run, not physical enough and yet Burns is playing softer than Cockrell ever did. Just don't understand it. And it isn't like he is this shut down CB who you can say hey, we drafted him to be a stud coverage guy. Where are the INTs? The broken up passes? Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.

When we played Cincy and I got my first chance to watch William Jackson the 3rd, it was eye opening. So, that is what a first round CB is supposed to perform like, tight coverage, playing the catch point, knocking the football out of Antonio Brown's hands. Yes! What we have in Burns in nowhere close to that, and may never be.

I don't know what this season would have been like without Mike Hilton and Joe Haden. If we had gone into this season with Burns, Cockrell and Gay as our trio, we might be lucky to be 4-4.

If people are honest, the two weakest performers on defense are which two players? For me that is Burns and Mitchell. They are the two biggest weaknesses that teams exploit and it isn't even close. One we spent a first round pick on and the other we signed to a 5 year $25 million contract. Not really getting a good return on those investments.

_________________
#greendot51


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 11752
Scunge wrote:
Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.


To be fair, both are arguably hamstrung by the cushions our defense loves. But Haden being a better match-up for us on #2 receivers doesn't make him bettern than Burns on #1's. Both also have Mike Mitchell having their backs, and like you said....

Burns has gotten beat, and has not been as good as hoped. But I don't think he's been bad by any stretch.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:30 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 6991
Scunge wrote:
I am disappointed in Burns this year. I expected a big jump from his rookie year to year two. I don't see it.

Everybody was so down on Ross Cockrell, calling him soft, can't play the run, not physical enough and yet Burns is playing softer than Cockrell ever did. Just don't understand it. And it isn't like he is this shut down CB who you can say hey, we drafted him to be a stud coverage guy. Where are the INTs? The broken up passes? Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.

When we played Cincy and I got my first chance to watch William Jackson the 3rd, it was eye opening. So, that is what a first round CB is supposed to perform like, tight coverage, playing the catch point, knocking the football out of Antonio Brown's hands. Yes! What we have in Burns in nowhere close to that, and may never be.

I don't know what this season would have been like without Mike Hilton and Joe Haden. If we had gone into this season with Burns, Cockrell and Gay as our trio, we might be lucky to be 4-4.

If people are honest, the two weakest performers on defense are which two players? For me that is Burns and Mitchell. They are the two biggest weaknesses that teams exploit and it isn't even close. One we spent a first round pick on and the other we signed to a 5 year $25 million contract. Not really getting a good return on those investments.

Agreed. I laugh when people call Burns a shutdown corner...not even close.

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:52 pm
Posts: 7345
BarryFoster wrote:
SP wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
You know he had 4 tackles vs the run on Sunday night, right?

First four all season. That's the problem.


But it's an improvement

He ain't no Artie Choke


"Mighta choked Arti....ain't gonna choke Stymie!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNSzZvEkoDE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 805
Scunge wrote:
I am disappointed in Burns this year. I expected a big jump from his rookie year to year two. I don't see it.

Everybody was so down on Ross Cockrell, calling him soft, can't play the run, not physical enough and yet Burns is playing softer than Cockrell ever did. Just don't understand it. And it isn't like he is this shut down CB who you can say hey, we drafted him to be a stud coverage guy. Where are the INTs? The broken up passes? Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.

When we played Cincy and I got my first chance to watch William Jackson the 3rd, it was eye opening. So, that is what a first round CB is supposed to perform like, tight coverage, playing the catch point, knocking the football out of Antonio Brown's hands. Yes! What we have in Burns in nowhere close to that, and may never be.

I don't know what this season would have been like without Mike Hilton and Joe Haden. If we had gone into this season with Burns, Cockrell and Gay as our trio, we might be lucky to be 4-4.

If people are honest, the two weakest performers on defense are which two players? For me that is Burns and Mitchell. They are the two biggest weaknesses that teams exploit and it isn't even close. One we spent a first round pick on and the other we signed to a 5 year $25 million contract. Not really getting a good return on those investments.


Spot on Scrung. $64 question is can he be coached up or he is what he is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 6849
Quote:

"Mighta choked Arti....ain't gonna choke Stymie!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNSzZvEkoDE

Report this post


You are the only one who got my reference

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:08 pm
Posts: 526
Wasn't Artie one of the youngest corners in the draft last year? The kid is young and talented. I think he's playing pretty well with room for improvement. And he has all the tools to improve with experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16585
Adjusted for opponent rankings:

vs #1 WR 15th
vs#2WR 19th
vs 3rd/4th WR 6th
vs TE 2nd
vs RB 17th.
Burns's side 30th
middle 10th
Haden side 1st
deep 19th
short 5th.
Short on Burns' side 24th, short on Haden side 1st.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef

_________________
VASteelerGuy wrote:
These refs suck


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Slacker, CzechSteeler, DP39, Google [Bot], JackLambert58, jbattenhouse, Jobus Rum, Majestic-12 [Bot], Pabst, PittWest, seabs926, StillerDownSouth, stillevil, the-other-burg and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group