It is currently Sun Jan 21, 2018 10:44 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 21704
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm coming around to the belief that the non-hold/DPI call on the last play was more egregious than the James overrule. If Rowe doesn't grab Rogers' jersey, he gets nowhere near the leverage to make the play.


I'm telling you that in real time I don't see Rogers getting slowed up.

It's too bang bang for DPI to be called there, B2B.

_________________
Bill Walsh: “Your ability to make good judgments is much easier on Thursday night than during the heat of the game."

R S: "All praise MJG. Fuck the NUT!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 9711
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:23 pm
Posts: 2880
Both the Steelers and the Putriots* are flawed, so there's no guarentee they meet in the AFCCG. But if it does come down to a game in foxboro, Bring It On. Seriously. The only thing more satisfying than getting over the hump in our house would be getting over the hump in their house.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:25 pm
Posts: 119
Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.


Can someone give me a non bullshit reason why the officials need "help" from New York?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 8561
Jeemie wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm coming around to the belief that the non-hold/DPI call on the last play was more egregious than the James overrule. If Rowe doesn't grab Rogers' jersey, he gets nowhere near the leverage to make the play.


I'm telling you that in real time I don't see Rogers getting slowed up.

It's too bang bang for DPI to be called there, B2B.




You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 21704
Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.


Well yeah- that's true.

_________________
Bill Walsh: “Your ability to make good judgments is much easier on Thursday night than during the heat of the game."

R S: "All praise MJG. Fuck the NUT!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 21704
GreekSteel wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm coming around to the belief that the non-hold/DPI call on the last play was more egregious than the James overrule. If Rowe doesn't grab Rogers' jersey, he gets nowhere near the leverage to make the play.


I'm telling you that in real time I don't see Rogers getting slowed up.

It's too bang bang for DPI to be called there, B2B.




You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


What I'm saying is in real time it's not as obvious as you are all making it out to be. There is no indication real-time that Rogers was impeded or Rowe got extra leverage. There simply isn't.

Slo-mo and freeze frames let you see it, but real time, it's not apparent.

I've said that from the beginning...we're going to have to agree to disagree.

Ben is not absolved...it was a dumb throw. That ball needs to be thrown low if it's going to be thrown...not high.

Sliding grab so it's either caught or incomplete.

The Steelers had two shots after the James overturn...the two plays they chose were horrible.

And that Bryant wasn't on the field was a travesty...so the coaches aren't absolved either.

_________________
Bill Walsh: “Your ability to make good judgments is much easier on Thursday night than during the heat of the game."

R S: "All praise MJG. Fuck the NUT!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:07 am
Posts: 8149
Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.


Riveron is a managed dolt. They got him off the field because he was incompetent, they moved him into that position to further fuck with him and the games outcomes

If you can't see that, then whatever.

_________________
ImageImage
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 14530
Jeemie wrote:
GreekSteel wrote:
You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


What I'm saying is in real time it's not as obvious as you are all making it out to be. There is no indication real-time that Rogers was impeded or Rowe got extra leverage. There simply isn't.

Slo-mo and freeze frames let you see it, but real time, it's not apparent.

The official standing at the goal post has one responsibility during this play: he's watching Eli Rogers from presnap to post-whistle. The jersey pull is immediately in front on the official responsible for watching Rogers.

_________________
Whatever it takes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:57 pm
Posts: 104
Kodiak wrote:
Same ref in NY made the call on ALL THREE of those NE games this year.

A heck of a lot easier when you only have to pay off 1 guy instead of a different crew of 8 every week....


Yep, the "one guy" is on retainer.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alancac98, Almighty Slacker, Bing [Bot], JackSplat58, Lynch, StillerInCT, swissvale72 and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group