It is currently Fri Oct 19, 2018 2:01 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23267
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm coming around to the belief that the non-hold/DPI call on the last play was more egregious than the James overrule. If Rowe doesn't grab Rogers' jersey, he gets nowhere near the leverage to make the play.


I'm telling you that in real time I don't see Rogers getting slowed up.

It's too bang bang for DPI to be called there, B2B.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 11317
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:23 pm
Posts: 3263
Both the Steelers and the Putriots* are flawed, so there's no guarentee they meet in the AFCCG. But if it does come down to a game in foxboro, Bring It On. Seriously. The only thing more satisfying than getting over the hump in our house would be getting over the hump in their house.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:25 pm
Posts: 121
Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.


Can someone give me a non bullshit reason why the officials need "help" from New York?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 9095
Jeemie wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm coming around to the belief that the non-hold/DPI call on the last play was more egregious than the James overrule. If Rowe doesn't grab Rogers' jersey, he gets nowhere near the leverage to make the play.


I'm telling you that in real time I don't see Rogers getting slowed up.

It's too bang bang for DPI to be called there, B2B.




You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23267
Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.


Well yeah- that's true.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23267
GreekSteel wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm coming around to the belief that the non-hold/DPI call on the last play was more egregious than the James overrule. If Rowe doesn't grab Rogers' jersey, he gets nowhere near the leverage to make the play.


I'm telling you that in real time I don't see Rogers getting slowed up.

It's too bang bang for DPI to be called there, B2B.




You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


What I'm saying is in real time it's not as obvious as you are all making it out to be. There is no indication real-time that Rogers was impeded or Rowe got extra leverage. There simply isn't.

Slo-mo and freeze frames let you see it, but real time, it's not apparent.

I've said that from the beginning...we're going to have to agree to disagree.

Ben is not absolved...it was a dumb throw. That ball needs to be thrown low if it's going to be thrown...not high.

Sliding grab so it's either caught or incomplete.

The Steelers had two shots after the James overturn...the two plays they chose were horrible.

And that Bryant wasn't on the field was a travesty...so the coaches aren't absolved either.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:07 am
Posts: 8350
Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
I do not believe Corrente worked the Houston/Pats game.

In fact, now I know it wasn't him- looked it up on Pro Football Reference...it was John Parry.


Riveron was the guy in the NY studio lording over all 3 of those reviews.


Riveron is a managed dolt. They got him off the field because he was incompetent, they moved him into that position to further fuck with him and the games outcomes

If you can't see that, then whatever.

_________________
ImageImage
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16315
Jeemie wrote:
GreekSteel wrote:
You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


What I'm saying is in real time it's not as obvious as you are all making it out to be. There is no indication real-time that Rogers was impeded or Rowe got extra leverage. There simply isn't.

Slo-mo and freeze frames let you see it, but real time, it's not apparent.

The official standing at the goal post has one responsibility during this play: he's watching Eli Rogers from presnap to post-whistle. The jersey pull is immediately in front on the official responsible for watching Rogers.

_________________
Suwanee88 wrote:
But it’s your fault that you are kind of a stubborn jagoff that would argue with a fence post


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:57 pm
Posts: 153
Kodiak wrote:
Same ref in NY made the call on ALL THREE of those NE games this year.

A heck of a lot easier when you only have to pay off 1 guy instead of a different crew of 8 every week....


Yep, the "one guy" is on retainer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:55 pm
Posts: 4421
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
GreekSteel wrote:
You absolutely make that call, and its not like you awarded the steelers the game by calling the obvious DPI, you offer both teams another chance to decide the game on their own rather than the refs becoming the focal point.


What I'm saying is in real time it's not as obvious as you are all making it out to be. There is no indication real-time that Rogers was impeded or Rowe got extra leverage. There simply isn't.

Slo-mo and freeze frames let you see it, but real time, it's not apparent.

The official standing at the goal post has one responsibility during this play: he's watching Eli Rogers from presnap to post-whistle. The jersey pull is immediately in front on the official responsible for watching Rogers.


Did you see the Ravens/49ers SB a few years back? They ain't calling that stuff at the end of the game in the EZ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23267
Donnie Brasco wrote:
Did you see the Ravens/49ers SB a few years back? They ain't calling that stuff at the end of the game in the EZ


The refs and the NFL cabal are a convenient target to mask the fact that the coaches and players put themselves in a situation to be fucked over by the refs and the NFL cabal.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 8891
Didn’t the refs throw something like 3 consecutive flags for PI or holding in the final seconds of the KC at Oakland game earlier this year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 7:55 pm
Posts: 673
Jeemie wrote:
Donnie Brasco wrote:
Did you see the Ravens/49ers SB a few years back? They ain't calling that stuff at the end of the game in the EZ


The refs and the NFL cabal are a convenient target to mask the fact that the coaches and players put themselves in a situation to be fucked over by the refs and the NFL cabal.


It's a known fact by now, when you play the Pats, as a team, you play the officials. No team benefits more from calls/no calls than the Pats.

Many times, that out of coaches and players control.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23267
Stillchest wrote:
It's a known fact by now, when you play the Pats, as a team, you play the officials. No team benefits more from calls/no calls than the Pats.

Many times, that out of coaches and players control.


Play aggressive offense for the full 60 minutes, and take it out of their control to the degree you can.

Play to ride out the last 15 minutes of a one score game...you deserve what you get.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:55 pm
Posts: 683
Kodiak wrote:
SteelThrillsseeker wrote:
The same ref three times now......on that note did he call all three the exact same way?
If you mean calling all 3 in NE's favor, then yes he called them all the same way.

Right - he actually applied the rule differently but the outcome always favored the Pats. For both the Steelers and the Jets he said it was no catch / TD because the catch wasn't completed. However, on the Pats TD vs Houston, he said he couldn't tell .....even though the rest of the world saw the ball hit the ground and move.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 9095
Orangesteel wrote:
Didn’t the refs throw something like 3 consecutive flags for PI or holding in the final seconds of the KC at Oakland game earlier this year?




they did indeed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 1459
I haven't read the whole thread, but why is this a catch, but JJ's wasn't? It's basically the identical play...

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000704268/Xavier-Grimble-dives-into-the-end-zone-for-a-20-yard-touchdown

Sorry, couldn't insert the video clip.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New take on the rule
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 6884
DP39 wrote:
I haven't read the whole thread, but why is this a catch, but JJ's wasn't? It's basically the identical play...

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000704268/Xavier-Grimble-dives-into-the-end-zone-for-a-20-yard-touchdown

Sorry, couldn't insert the video clip.

Grimble caught the pass, then ran/stumbled/dove into the end zone. That establishes possession.
JJ went to the ground to make the catch, then lunged and extended to the goal line. IMO, that also establishes possession...the officials and NFL disagree.

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group