It is currently Sun Oct 21, 2018 10:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 394
I have not seen it done, but I’d like to know who has defended him best. What scheme seems to work? Nobody’s going to shut him down, but perhaps a scheme minimizes the number of targets he can get.

_________________
Amateur photographer who's still learning - see my Flickr page:
https://www.flickr.com/people/fotosbyfree/


Last edited by 44LetzRide on Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:50 pm
Posts: 753
Chiefs, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers and Broncos each held him to 4 or fewer catches and no TDs.

How the hell did they do it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:07 am
Posts: 8350
Baltostiller wrote:
Chiefs, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers and Broncos each held him to 4 or fewer catches and no TDs.

How the hell did they do it?


Had a quality DB

Hayden is next man up

_________________
ImageImage
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 1682
Baltostiller wrote:
Chiefs, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers and Broncos each held him to 4 or fewer catches and no TDs.

How the hell did they do it?

Well...the Raiders simply didn't defend Brandin Cooks, and the Falcons were gashed in the run game. The Broncos and Chiefs both had strong secondaries. The Panthers still allowed 30 points, so I wouldn't say they really contained the Pats.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:09 am
Posts: 301
the most fitting strategy is to outfit all of your safeties with very heavy metal elbow braces and have them take repeated cracks at breaking his fucking jaw or giving him a concussion. preferably after the play is over and out of bounds if at all possible.

_________________
Think nobody cares.....try missing a couple payments


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:57 pm
Posts: 3142
The Steelers doubled no one in the game. They should have bracketed Gronk

_________________
To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
- Henri Poincaré


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 394
Baltostiller wrote:
Chiefs, Raiders, Falcons, Panthers and Broncos each held him to 4 or fewer catches and no TDs.

How the hell did they do it?


Out of this group, only the Chiefs see them regularly - oh and the Broncos

_________________
Amateur photographer who's still learning - see my Flickr page:
https://www.flickr.com/people/fotosbyfree/


Last edited by 44LetzRide on Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:40 am
Posts: 2216
So sadly I rewatched the game especially the second half focusing on Gronk and Davis. The one thing that was apparent was that Brady was throwing to Gronk's shoulder opposite of Davis's position. Gronk pushed off a lot to create separation but Davis stayed w/ him but mostly trailing. Mitchell should've been able to read this but he never seemed to be either cognizant or in position. He continually played super deep and if he would've played normal safety depth he would've been able to make a play on some of those passes.

If Butler actually had Mitchell or an LB bracketing Gronk, we would be talking a different story. Butler failed to adjust and it bit him in the rear. I still say a faster, bigger guy like Allen would've been a better man matchup but that meant losing either Sutton or Gay and they weren't willing to do that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:50 pm
Posts: 753
Mitchell is as worthless at tits on a bull. When was the last time he arrived in time in either 2 deep or single high to break up a pass? I think it is before my vasectomy when he was still in college. Make a fucking play on the ball. I'd rather have Mike Wagner at 68 at this point. At least he could recognize the play...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Posts: 3988
Haden.

His size and his long arms would be a little more favorable, but if Brady is dealing and Gronk is healthy he’s a matchup nightmare for anyone.

_________________
SteelThrillsseeker wrote:
Dad showed up after work and according to her the entire hospital hears my dad yell you are not naming our son Hoss.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 394
TB wrote:
Haden.

His size and his long arms would be a little more favorable, but if Brady is dealing and Gronk is healthy he’s a matchup nightmare for anyone.


I was thinking in terms of what team defends him best. I'm optimistic with Haden, Sutton, Hilton and Burns. As bad a day as Sean Davis had, I think he'll rebound along with Keith Butler making some adjustments. I'm slightly more concerned about run defense.

_________________
Amateur photographer who's still learning - see my Flickr page:
https://www.flickr.com/people/fotosbyfree/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:19 pm
Posts: 2309
Mitchell needs to take a head shot at him.take the 15 and get Gronk in the concussion protocol.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:52 pm
Posts: 7291
Steel Ubaldo wrote:
Mitchell needs to take a head shot at him.take the 15 and get Gronk in the concussion protocol.


I'm looking for the Buffalo Bills to exact some revenge on Christmas Eve, and said that fucker home with a cast on his league.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:18 pm
Posts: 10479
dude was in beast mode. what a load...best defense is the IR... maybe bills rough him up..maybe they can bait him into another defenseless hit and he suspended longer..im grasping at straws and hoping.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:20 am
Posts: 5415
Stillcajun wrote:
So sadly I rewatched the game especially the second half focusing on Gronk and Davis. The one thing that was apparent was that Brady was throwing to Gronk's shoulder opposite of Davis's position. Gronk pushed off a lot to create separation but Davis stayed w/ him but mostly trailing. Mitchell should've been able to read this but he never seemed to be either cognizant or in position. He continually played super deep and if he would've played normal safety depth he would've been able to make a play on some of those passes.

If Butler actually had Mitchell or an LB bracketing Gronk, we would be talking a different story. Butler failed to adjust and it bit him in the rear. I still say a faster, bigger guy like Allen would've been a better man matchup but that meant losing either Sutton or Gay and they weren't willing to do that.


That's exactly how i saw it live.
Thanks for rewatching.
Could not believe he was so much further back...on those deep center of field passes.
Insane. Was not even in camera/tv screen.
Brady is not taking 35-40 yard shots over the top of mitchell.
He certainly needed to break up one or two of those

_________________
"Tomlin doubled down on dumb" JackSplat58


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1920
The one thing that can't be lost is that the defense we played against NE is the RIGHT way to do it.

I have to think that if Haden and Shazier were both healthy and had played that the game would have been drastically different and that Brady and Gronk would have had a much more difficult time of it.

Shazier's pass coverage is on another level from other linebackers. He had what this year, 14 passes defensed and 3 INTs? Joe Haden, sorry to break it to the rest of you, is better than Artie Burns. Haden is our best CB, better in man, better in zone, better as a blitzer, better in all facets than Burns.

So, to have both of those players out, your best coverage linebacker, and your best coverage cornerback, was pretty damaging and made it hard to stop Gronk.

And yet, can anybody remember a game where Brady was slightly off, wasn't as efficient? He wasn't the world beater, the GOAT this time around was he? No, mixing it up, playing more man to man did give them pause, did make them uncomfortable, did make them less effective. Brady was getting hit, was getting pressured, was getting sacked.

What we did against NE is what I want us to expand upon AGAINST every other NFL team. There is no reason why we can't have a flexible scheme that plays way more man. Look, even the best man to man teams may only play it 50% of the time but us, we are usually the last or 2nd to the last in terms of playing man the least, maybe 10-15% of the time.

You play man and it takes away those quick pass plays where the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds. QB has to hold the ball longer giving your pass rushers more time to apply pressure, to get hurried passes and sacks.

My hope is that this game is not quickly forgotten and that is it a watershed moment and the beginning of an evolution of this defense.

_________________
#greendot51


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 9097
Scunge wrote:
The one thing that can't be lost is that the defense we played against NE is the RIGHT way to do it.

I have to think that if Haden and Shazier were both healthy and had played that the game would have been drastically different and that Brady and Gronk would have had a much more difficult time of it.

Shazier's pass coverage is on another level from other linebackers. He had what this year, 14 passes defensed and 3 INTs? Joe Haden, sorry to break it to the rest of you, is better than Artie Burns. Haden is our best CB, better in man, better in zone, better as a blitzer, better in all facets than Burns.

So, to have both of those players out, your best coverage linebacker, and your best coverage cornerback, was pretty damaging and made it hard to stop Gronk.

And yet, can anybody remember a game where Brady was slightly off, wasn't as efficient? He wasn't the world beater, the GOAT this time around was he? No, mixing it up, playing more man to man did give them pause, did make them uncomfortable, did make them less effective. Brady was getting hit, was getting pressured, was getting sacked.

What we did against NE is what I want us to expand upon AGAINST every other NFL team. There is no reason why we can't have a flexible scheme that plays way more man. Look, even the best man to man teams may only play it 50% of the time but us, we are usually the last or 2nd to the last in terms of playing man the least, maybe 10-15% of the time.

You play man and it takes away those quick pass plays where the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds. QB has to hold the ball longer giving your pass rushers more time to apply pressure, to get hurried passes and sacks.

My hope is that this game is not quickly forgotten and that is it a watershed moment and the beginning of an evolution of this defense.




Agreed Scunge, and just to add to your post, playing man to man, sends a message of confidence
to every last guy on defense, it gives them energy, more ownership over the D, I mean not 1 kid who grows up wanting to play D, dreams of playing a zone fucking defense, they like to be challenged and play man to man, have a chance to make a break on a ball, get an INT, same for D line they grow up wanting to rush the passer, not titty fighting and only setting the edge. I loved watching this team team get after the patriots and for the most part the results were fantastic. and no doubt haden and shazier would take that defense to a whole other level, and yes like any thing else, mixing it up and keeping the offense guessing and uncomfortable is a key as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16332
If Haden is healthy and there is a next time with the Pats, I'm putting him on Gronk, plus a double or serious chuck at the line from whichever OLB is lined up on his side. Sutton and Burns and Hilton weren't perfect, but they were good enough.

_________________
Suwanee88 wrote:
But it’s your fault that you are kind of a stubborn jagoff that would argue with a fence post


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6330
jebrick wrote:
The Steelers doubled no one in the game. They should have bracketed Gronk
This, at least in critical downs. I noticed that on first viewing. Key situations on third down.

How many third and short 10 yard gains did he have in that game?

I saw single coverage on a few third downs and predicted the throw to gronk. And guess what. Every fucking time.

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:46 pm
Posts: 195
Scunge wrote:
The one thing that can't be lost is that the defense we played against NE is the RIGHT way to do it.

I have to think that if Haden and Shazier were both healthy and had played that the game would have been drastically different and that Brady and Gronk would have had a much more difficult time of it.

Shazier's pass coverage is on another level from other linebackers. He had what this year, 14 passes defensed and 3 INTs? Joe Haden, sorry to break it to the rest of you, is better than Artie Burns. Haden is our best CB, better in man, better in zone, better as a blitzer, better in all facets than Burns.

So, to have both of those players out, your best coverage linebacker, and your best coverage cornerback, was pretty damaging and made it hard to stop Gronk.

And yet, can anybody remember a game where Brady was slightly off, wasn't as efficient? He wasn't the world beater, the GOAT this time around was he? No, mixing it up, playing more man to man did give them pause, did make them uncomfortable, did make them less effective. Brady was getting hit, was getting pressured, was getting sacked.

What we did against NE is what I want us to expand upon AGAINST every other NFL team. There is no reason why we can't have a flexible scheme that plays way more man. Look, even the best man to man teams may only play it 50% of the time but us, we are usually the last or 2nd to the last in terms of playing man the least, maybe 10-15% of the time.

You play man and it takes away those quick pass plays where the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds. QB has to hold the ball longer giving your pass rushers more time to apply pressure, to get hurried passes and sacks.

My hope is that this game is not quickly forgotten and that is it a watershed moment and the beginning of an evolution of this defense.



THIS !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1920
Yeah, who is it, PFF, reporting that we played man to man 65% against NE and that number was only 12% in the previous 13 games of this season.

That is just way too much of a discrepancy, but you can't argue with the results though. Mike Hilton was incredible, had two pass breakups with one being denying Gronk in the end zone. They were leaving the big uglies in the game more, Hargarve played a lot as they went with 3 man defensive lines, they even had more 4 man defensive lines.

I have been arguing for more 4-3 looks, for having more defensive linemen on the field and for more man to man, that is the way for this defense to evolve.

Again, just a shame that Shazier and Haden were out, I think NE would have been held to less than 20 points. What I want to see for next season is a flushing out of the last remaining LeBeau vets and embracing the youth that we have and finally switching the defense to something else.

Let go of Willie Gay and James Harrison. Get rid of Mike Mitchell and Art Moats, and then add some new players through the draft and free agency. Keep Haden, so his contract increases next year, so what? If you move on from Mitchell, bam, there is the money that can be shifted to keep Haden.

_________________
#greendot51


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6330
Who defends gronkowski the best?

His lawyer/ agent, and his girlfriend.

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:17 pm
Posts: 1562
Bear traps.

_________________
KC wrote:
I got nothin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:17 pm
Posts: 1562
Scunge wrote:
Yeah, who is it, PFF, reporting that we played man to man 65% against NE and that number was only 12% in the previous 13 games of this season.

That is just way too much of a discrepancy, but you can't argue with the results though. Mike Hilton was incredible, had two pass breakups with one being denying Gronk in the end zone. They were leaving the big uglies in the game more, Hargarve played a lot as they went with 3 man defensive lines, they even had more 4 man defensive lines.

I have been arguing for more 4-3 looks, for having more defensive linemen on the field and for more man to man, that is the way for this defense to evolve.

Again, just a shame that Shazier and Haden were out, I think NE would have been held to less than 20 points. What I want to see for next season is a flushing out of the last remaining LeBeau vets and embracing the youth that we have and finally switching the defense to something else.

Let go of Willie Gay and James Harrison. Get rid of Mike Mitchell and Art Moats, and then add some new players through the draft and free agency. Keep Haden, so his contract increases next year, so what? If you move on from Mitchell, bam, there is the money that can be shifted to keep Haden.

Mitchell has to go. That 2nd half debacle is on him.

_________________
KC wrote:
I got nothin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:34 pm
Posts: 23270
86n96 wrote:
Scunge wrote:
Yeah, who is it, PFF, reporting that we played man to man 65% against NE and that number was only 12% in the previous 13 games of this season.

That is just way too much of a discrepancy, but you can't argue with the results though. Mike Hilton was incredible, had two pass breakups with one being denying Gronk in the end zone. They were leaving the big uglies in the game more, Hargarve played a lot as they went with 3 man defensive lines, they even had more 4 man defensive lines.

I have been arguing for more 4-3 looks, for having more defensive linemen on the field and for more man to man, that is the way for this defense to evolve.

Again, just a shame that Shazier and Haden were out, I think NE would have been held to less than 20 points. What I want to see for next season is a flushing out of the last remaining LeBeau vets and embracing the youth that we have and finally switching the defense to something else.

Let go of Willie Gay and James Harrison. Get rid of Mike Mitchell and Art Moats, and then add some new players through the draft and free agency. Keep Haden, so his contract increases next year, so what? If you move on from Mitchell, bam, there is the money that can be shifted to keep Haden.

Mitchell has to go. That 2nd half debacle is on him.


I still can’t get over that play on the final sequence where the Pats had two receivers on either side of the formation, and he cheated AWAY from Gronkowski’s side.

_________________
“A set of several simple rules leads to complex, intelligent behavior. While a set of complex rules often leads to dumb and primitive behavior.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Slacker, Google [Bot], Steel Drummer, steelsmitty, TB, Will-the-Shake and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group