It is currently Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 356
TB wrote:
Haden.

His size and his long arms would be a little more favorable, but if Brady is dealing and Gronk is healthy he’s a matchup nightmare for anyone.


I was thinking in terms of what team defends him best. I'm optimistic with Haden, Sutton, Hilton and Burns. As bad a day as Sean Davis had, I think he'll rebound along with Keith Butler making some adjustments. I'm slightly more concerned about run defense.

_________________
Amateur photographer who's still learning - see my Flickr page:
https://www.flickr.com/people/fotosbyfree/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:23 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:19 pm
Posts: 2155
Mitchell needs to take a head shot at him.take the 15 and get Gronk in the concussion protocol.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:52 pm
Posts: 6760
Steel Ubaldo wrote:
Mitchell needs to take a head shot at him.take the 15 and get Gronk in the concussion protocol.


I'm looking for the Buffalo Bills to exact some revenge on Christmas Eve, and said that fucker home with a cast on his league.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:18 pm
Posts: 9459
dude was in beast mode. what a load...best defense is the IR... maybe bills rough him up..maybe they can bait him into another defenseless hit and he suspended longer..im grasping at straws and hoping.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:20 am
Posts: 4792
Stillcajun wrote:
So sadly I rewatched the game especially the second half focusing on Gronk and Davis. The one thing that was apparent was that Brady was throwing to Gronk's shoulder opposite of Davis's position. Gronk pushed off a lot to create separation but Davis stayed w/ him but mostly trailing. Mitchell should've been able to read this but he never seemed to be either cognizant or in position. He continually played super deep and if he would've played normal safety depth he would've been able to make a play on some of those passes.

If Butler actually had Mitchell or an LB bracketing Gronk, we would be talking a different story. Butler failed to adjust and it bit him in the rear. I still say a faster, bigger guy like Allen would've been a better man matchup but that meant losing either Sutton or Gay and they weren't willing to do that.


That's exactly how i saw it live.
Thanks for rewatching.
Could not believe he was so much further back...on those deep center of field passes.
Insane. Was not even in camera/tv screen.
Brady is not taking 35-40 yard shots over the top of mitchell.
He certainly needed to break up one or two of those

_________________
"Tomlin doubled down on dumb" JackSplat58


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1354
The one thing that can't be lost is that the defense we played against NE is the RIGHT way to do it.

I have to think that if Haden and Shazier were both healthy and had played that the game would have been drastically different and that Brady and Gronk would have had a much more difficult time of it.

Shazier's pass coverage is on another level from other linebackers. He had what this year, 14 passes defensed and 3 INTs? Joe Haden, sorry to break it to the rest of you, is better than Artie Burns. Haden is our best CB, better in man, better in zone, better as a blitzer, better in all facets than Burns.

So, to have both of those players out, your best coverage linebacker, and your best coverage cornerback, was pretty damaging and made it hard to stop Gronk.

And yet, can anybody remember a game where Brady was slightly off, wasn't as efficient? He wasn't the world beater, the GOAT this time around was he? No, mixing it up, playing more man to man did give them pause, did make them uncomfortable, did make them less effective. Brady was getting hit, was getting pressured, was getting sacked.

What we did against NE is what I want us to expand upon AGAINST every other NFL team. There is no reason why we can't have a flexible scheme that plays way more man. Look, even the best man to man teams may only play it 50% of the time but us, we are usually the last or 2nd to the last in terms of playing man the least, maybe 10-15% of the time.

You play man and it takes away those quick pass plays where the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds. QB has to hold the ball longer giving your pass rushers more time to apply pressure, to get hurried passes and sacks.

My hope is that this game is not quickly forgotten and that is it a watershed moment and the beginning of an evolution of this defense.

_________________
TJ Watt, the next Brian Urlacher for the new Pittsburgh Steeler 4-3 defense for 2018?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 8504
Scunge wrote:
The one thing that can't be lost is that the defense we played against NE is the RIGHT way to do it.

I have to think that if Haden and Shazier were both healthy and had played that the game would have been drastically different and that Brady and Gronk would have had a much more difficult time of it.

Shazier's pass coverage is on another level from other linebackers. He had what this year, 14 passes defensed and 3 INTs? Joe Haden, sorry to break it to the rest of you, is better than Artie Burns. Haden is our best CB, better in man, better in zone, better as a blitzer, better in all facets than Burns.

So, to have both of those players out, your best coverage linebacker, and your best coverage cornerback, was pretty damaging and made it hard to stop Gronk.

And yet, can anybody remember a game where Brady was slightly off, wasn't as efficient? He wasn't the world beater, the GOAT this time around was he? No, mixing it up, playing more man to man did give them pause, did make them uncomfortable, did make them less effective. Brady was getting hit, was getting pressured, was getting sacked.

What we did against NE is what I want us to expand upon AGAINST every other NFL team. There is no reason why we can't have a flexible scheme that plays way more man. Look, even the best man to man teams may only play it 50% of the time but us, we are usually the last or 2nd to the last in terms of playing man the least, maybe 10-15% of the time.

You play man and it takes away those quick pass plays where the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds. QB has to hold the ball longer giving your pass rushers more time to apply pressure, to get hurried passes and sacks.

My hope is that this game is not quickly forgotten and that is it a watershed moment and the beginning of an evolution of this defense.




Agreed Scunge, and just to add to your post, playing man to man, sends a message of confidence
to every last guy on defense, it gives them energy, more ownership over the D, I mean not 1 kid who grows up wanting to play D, dreams of playing a zone fucking defense, they like to be challenged and play man to man, have a chance to make a break on a ball, get an INT, same for D line they grow up wanting to rush the passer, not titty fighting and only setting the edge. I loved watching this team team get after the patriots and for the most part the results were fantastic. and no doubt haden and shazier would take that defense to a whole other level, and yes like any thing else, mixing it up and keeping the offense guessing and uncomfortable is a key as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 14477
If Haden is healthy and there is a next time with the Pats, I'm putting him on Gronk, plus a double or serious chuck at the line from whichever OLB is lined up on his side. Sutton and Burns and Hilton weren't perfect, but they were good enough.

_________________
Whatever it takes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 5535
jebrick wrote:
The Steelers doubled no one in the game. They should have bracketed Gronk
This, at least in critical downs. I noticed that on first viewing. Key situations on third down.

How many third and short 10 yard gains did he have in that game?

I saw single coverage on a few third downs and predicted the throw to gronk. And guess what. Every fucking time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Who Defends Gronkowski Best?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:46 pm
Posts: 168
Scunge wrote:
The one thing that can't be lost is that the defense we played against NE is the RIGHT way to do it.

I have to think that if Haden and Shazier were both healthy and had played that the game would have been drastically different and that Brady and Gronk would have had a much more difficult time of it.

Shazier's pass coverage is on another level from other linebackers. He had what this year, 14 passes defensed and 3 INTs? Joe Haden, sorry to break it to the rest of you, is better than Artie Burns. Haden is our best CB, better in man, better in zone, better as a blitzer, better in all facets than Burns.

So, to have both of those players out, your best coverage linebacker, and your best coverage cornerback, was pretty damaging and made it hard to stop Gronk.

And yet, can anybody remember a game where Brady was slightly off, wasn't as efficient? He wasn't the world beater, the GOAT this time around was he? No, mixing it up, playing more man to man did give them pause, did make them uncomfortable, did make them less effective. Brady was getting hit, was getting pressured, was getting sacked.

What we did against NE is what I want us to expand upon AGAINST every other NFL team. There is no reason why we can't have a flexible scheme that plays way more man. Look, even the best man to man teams may only play it 50% of the time but us, we are usually the last or 2nd to the last in terms of playing man the least, maybe 10-15% of the time.

You play man and it takes away those quick pass plays where the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds. QB has to hold the ball longer giving your pass rushers more time to apply pressure, to get hurried passes and sacks.

My hope is that this game is not quickly forgotten and that is it a watershed moment and the beginning of an evolution of this defense.



THIS !


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alancac98, captainwoj, Google [Bot], JackSplat58, Majestic-12 [Bot], Nick79, seabs926, Steel Ubaldo, StillerInCT, stillevil, Suwanee88 and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group