It is currently Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 1443
SteelKnife wrote:
DrMalba wrote:

My issue is if they know the risks or not. The NFL not actively trying to cover it up anymore is an important step.
The guys all the way up through the last decade, they had little to no idea. We used to love NFL films blooper reels of them getting clocked and stumbling around.

A player now has a better idea what is coming and how full of shit the NFL's studies and surveys on long-term player mental health and are at least in a better position to assess the risks objectively. The league is also taking better care of them now when concussions happen (although, that system is still getting gamed and there is still a lot to fix).
Some guys are still of the mentality they don't care about what happens later, they want to take care of them and theirs right now, and if it means sacrificing their mind and body, so be it. If those guys know the risks and still want to play, I will still enjoy watching them excel at what very few people on planet earth can do.

All said, I would be very sad if we find Timmons was dealing with mental health issues. That guy ran through brick walls for the Black and Gold every Sunday for decades, never bitched, never complained. He played at a pro-bowl level (even if he didn't get the actual accolades) on some very good defenses. I loved Timmons as a player, and I just hope he's OK and this is a bunch of nothing.



I generally agree with you, but the NFL is still actively seeking to minimize the links between football and CTE. It was carved out of the concussion settlement. Every time a study shows a link, they refute it, or cautiously say "more research is needed." They're still being deceptive.

Stall and deflect.....the oldest legal strategy in the book.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16267
Laying the Wood wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
it's still yggy wrote:
If this is the onset of CTE at 31, I'd say it's time to find a soccer team to root for.


Seriously. If this is what is happening how in the hell can we root for these guys to bang into each other if it means dementia at 31?


That's where I am at this point. Many here would call me a pussy for it, or for refusing to let my kids play football.

Why is it spiking now? Is it that much worse than 10 years ago? 20?

Practice was padded and rough
receivers and WRs got hit with impunity
few player protection rules
no concussion protocol
primitive helmet technology

Why wasn't nearly every retired player suffering from significant symptoms? If anything, the incidence should be decreasing, not accelerating.

Of course, awareness is a huge factor-- but stories about older generation players' issues centered around their knees and fingers-- not their punch-drunkeness.

Furthermore, like race car drivers and boxers, et al, they get paid 3000 times more than teachers because of the risks. We watch because of the risks and the dangers and the pain and those who overcome those obstacles to do incredible things.

_________________
Suwanee88 wrote:
But it’s your fault that you are kind of a stubborn jagoff that would argue with a fence post


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6314
bradshaw2ben wrote:
We watch because of the risks and the dangers and the pain and those who overcome those obstacles to do incredible things.
Not disputing what you are saying, but incredible things is subject to interpretation. Guys chasing each other on a grassy field is entertainment for those that watch, but its actual contribution to society is not much more than gladiators fighting lions or each other. They've just incorporated technology and scientific advancements coupled with capitalism to fuel a portion of the economy. It positively affects a very small proportion of the demographic. i.e. Owners/ corporate sponsorship and the media; lifting a few people out of poverty. If football went away tomorrow, I'm not sure society would be at a great loss. Instead of developing rehab/ surgical and performance enhancing techniques for players, society would hopefully be giving that attention to the handicapped, the poor, etc. And soccer. :o ;)

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 16267
I'm not even arguing that it's good for society-- just that they'd have been much better off never downplaying the risks. You knew when you signed up that you could get hurt... or worse. It's part of why you get $110M.

_________________
Suwanee88 wrote:
But it’s your fault that you are kind of a stubborn jagoff that would argue with a fence post


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 7:58 pm
Posts: 802
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm not even arguing that it's good for society-- just that they'd have been much better off never downplaying the risks. You knew when you signed up that you could get hurt... or worse. It's part of why you get $110M.


A couple thoughts...

I don't necessarily think it's more prevalent now, just more visible. The NFL has, rather notoriously, cast many of its retired players aside and failed to provide them basic medical care and pensions until they were forced to. Many of them died before CTE became widely known and accepted -- often times, in their 50s and 60s. I also think the public at large just flat out didn't care about player safety. Hell, many posters on this board today don't give a shit and refuse to acknowledge that CTE is a legitimate condition.

We all just thought Earnie Holmes was nuts for shooting a police helicopter, or that Justin Stzrelczyk snapped out of no where. Or that Mike Webster was merely mentally ill, and it was unrelated to sustaining car-crash-like collisions for almost 20 years.

As for the guys making $110 million... for every one of them, there are countless others who fizzled out of the league in under three years, banking a few hundred thousand dollars and sustaining lifelong injuries in the process.

The biggest distinction I can make is that these guys knew that they were risking knee, shoulder, and back injuries. They signed up for that and the money/glory was worth the risk. I don't think the same can be said of traumatic brain injuries. The NFL knew about concussions and CTE and deliberately misled players on the risks and dangers inherent to playing football. Not only did league officials deny any link between football, concussions, and CTE -- team doctors actively advised players to play through concussions when the risk of more traumatic injury was heightened.

Now, I think the NFL has no choice but to warn players as to the risk of CTE. Why didn't they do it sooner? Because their player base -- peewee, high school, and college players -- would dry up as more and more parents discouraged or disallowed their children from participating. Further, they knew the American public would develop a distaste for watching grown men destroy each other's brains for our amusement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4238
COR-TEN wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
We watch because of the risks and the dangers and the pain and those who overcome those obstacles to do incredible things.
Not disputing what you are saying, but incredible things is subject to interpretation. Guys chasing each other on a grassy field is entertainment for those that watch, but its actual contribution to society is not much more than gladiators fighting lions or each other. They've just incorporated technology and scientific advancements coupled with capitalism to fuel a portion of the economy. It positively affects a very small proportion of the demographic. i.e. Owners/ corporate sponsorship and the media; lifting a few people out of poverty. If football went away tomorrow, I'm not sure society would be at a great loss. Instead of developing rehab/ surgical and performance enhancing techniques for players, society would hopefully be giving that attention to the handicapped, the poor, etc. And soccer. :o ;)


This post is so dumb it's pitiful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 7:50 pm
Posts: 188
bradshaw2ben wrote:
I'm not even arguing that it's good for society-- just that they'd have been much better off never downplaying the risks. You knew when you signed up that you could get hurt... or worse. It's part of why you get $110M.


+1
Was talking to a guy at work today and said something to the same affect. If you don't want to increase your chances of getting hurt, give up that $60M contract and be a doctor or something... I can totally understand both options; If a guy wants to play the game, great! Retire early before his brain is a scrambled egg, also great!

I think the NFL is in a great decline though. True fans will always watch, but I've never seen so many empty seats. Ticket prices are through the roof for the marquee games. On the flip side, they're practically giving away free tickets to the lousy games and nobody shows up (see IND vs. LAR). Alcohol and merchandise prices are stupid. Pricing just to park your vehicle has gotten out of hand. Now you got this CTE thing scaring the crap out of these younger guys and in some cases resulting in wasted draft picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:46 pm
Posts: 1447
What's funny is the league source that said it's probably not cte because they've never seen it as young as 31.

CTE and age 31 is about the one headline the NFL doesn't want more than any other. Kind of like the Mexican tourism bureau and mother of five decapitated by drug gang.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:38 pm 
Online

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 10:46 pm
Posts: 1079
I haven't seen it at age 31, but several of the men I worked with were late 30s/early 40s and showing serious symptoms. 31 would not surprise me at all.

_________________
Fire Alleva.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:32 pm
Posts: 424
Pretty sure Chris Henry was diagnosed with CTE - he was younger than 30, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:22 pm
Posts: 2406
it's still yggy wrote:
What's funny is the league source that said it's probably not cte because they've never seen it as young as 31.

CTE and age 31 is about the one headline the NFL doesn't want more than any other. Kind of like the Mexican tourism bureau and mother of five decapitated by drug gang.


Maybe he said it's not CTE because it's not CTE?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 2648
Havoc wrote:
COR-TEN wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
We watch because of the risks and the dangers and the pain and those who overcome those obstacles to do incredible things.
Not disputing what you are saying, but incredible things is subject to interpretation. Guys chasing each other on a grassy field is entertainment for those that watch, but its actual contribution to society is not much more than gladiators fighting lions or each other. They've just incorporated technology and scientific advancements coupled with capitalism to fuel a portion of the economy. It positively affects a very small proportion of the demographic. i.e. Owners/ corporate sponsorship and the media; lifting a few people out of poverty. If football went away tomorrow, I'm not sure society would be at a great loss. Instead of developing rehab/ surgical and performance enhancing techniques for players, society would hopefully be giving that attention to the handicapped, the poor, etc. And soccer. :o ;)


This post is so dumb it's pitiful.


Not really, it's pretty on point.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4238
VanWilder wrote:
Not really, it's pretty on point.


Have you ever competed in anything dangerous after you left your mommas warm safe shelter at 18?

The post is a farce.


Last edited by Havoc on Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 7:56 pm
Posts: 1040
Havoc wrote:
VanWilder wrote:
Not really, it's pretty on point.


Have you ever competed in anything dangerous after you left your mommas warm safe shelter at 18?

Playing football does not make you a slave killing slaves and being eaten by lions.

The post is a farce.


The post isn't a farce. Of course the game of football doesn't directly equate to the gladiator arena.

However, it does serve a similar, if not the same, purpose as those ancient games. And that purpose is public entertainment and distraction.

In that regard, it is accurate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4238
randomsteelerfan wrote:
The post isn't a farce. Of course the game of football doesn't directly equate to the gladiator arena.

However, it does serve a similar, if not the same, purpose as those ancient games. And that purpose is public entertainment and distraction.

In that regard, it is accurate.


I could quickly come up with a long list of things that serve as public entertainment and distraction. Meaningless to the discussion of CTE.

Most drive automobiles but we are not all nascar drivers.

If we discuss your poor ability to parallell park, zero point in bringing up nascar. Nascar does not belong in the conversation.

How about simply an honest discussion about CTE without the slaves killing slaves and eaten by lions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 7:56 pm
Posts: 1040
Havoc wrote:
randomsteelerfan wrote:
The post isn't a farce. Of course the game of football doesn't directly equate to the gladiator arena.

However, it does serve a similar, if not the same, purpose as those ancient games. And that purpose is public entertainment and distraction.

In that regard, it is accurate.


I could quickly come up with a long list of things that serve as public entertainment and distraction. Meaningless to the discussion of CTE.

Most drive automobiles but we are not all nascar drivers.

If we discuss your poor ability to parallell park, zero point in bringing up nascar. Nascar does not belong in the conversation.

How about simply an honest discussion about CTE without the slaves killing slaves and eaten by lions?


Sorry, bro, but what are you talking about? You're completely missing the point of the post in question.

It's not about slaves vs slaves or even CTE. He simply reference the parallels between the basic meaninglessness of the NFL in society and its hierarchal place. One that is very similar to the gladiator games.

Equate that to CTE or slaves however you want. Doesn't alter the premise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5490
fortythree wrote:
it's still yggy wrote:
What's funny is the league source that said it's probably not cte because they've never seen it as young as 31.

CTE and age 31 is about the one headline the NFL doesn't want more than any other. Kind of like the Mexican tourism bureau and mother of five decapitated by drug gang.


Maybe he said it's not CTE because it's not CTE?


Exactly. Its the new universal excuse for anything that's happened.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5490
Havoc wrote:
VanWilder wrote:
Not really, it's pretty on point.


Have you ever competed in anything dangerous after you left your mommas warm safe shelter at 18?

The post is a farce.


It's a new concept that entertainment must be good for society.....That would sure as shit eliminate 98% of things people do for entertainment.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5490
SteelKnife wrote:
R S wrote:

I read the posts here.




Perhaps, but apparently you did not comprehend them.

Quote:
If this is


Quote:
If what is going on is in fact mental health/cte related


Quote:
If this is what it sounds like


Ok Knife, right.

As long as you put "if" in front of something, then it makes total sense to go off on a rant against that HIGHLY hypothetical situation that is completely unproven to be true. Also rant about your kids safety, and football being unethical. Just throw that "if" in there. Did they cover that in law school?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5490
FromPittWithLove wrote:
Pretty sure Chris Henry was diagnosed with CTE - he was younger than 30, right?


You might be getting that mixed up with him falling out of the bed of the truck and cracking his head open like an egg. But hey, you have a football player.....a WR at that, low impact position, with a history of drugs, poor judgment, trouble with the law, etc, his entire life. But once he gets to the NFL and does something stupid it's definitely CTE :roll:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4238
randomsteelerfan wrote:
Havoc wrote:
randomsteelerfan wrote:
The post isn't a farce. Of course the game of football doesn't directly equate to the gladiator arena.

However, it does serve a similar, if not the same, purpose as those ancient games. And that purpose is public entertainment and distraction.

In that regard, it is accurate.


I could quickly come up with a long list of things that serve as public entertainment and distraction. Meaningless to the discussion of CTE.

Most drive automobiles but we are not all nascar drivers.

If we discuss your poor ability to parallell park, zero point in bringing up nascar. Nascar does not belong in the conversation.

How about simply an honest discussion about CTE without the slaves killing slaves and eaten by lions?


Sorry, bro, but what are you talking about? You're completely missing the point of the post in question.

It's not about slaves vs slaves or even CTE. He simply reference the parallels between the basic meaninglessness of the NFL in society and its hierarchal place. One that is very similar to the gladiator games.

Equate that to CTE or slaves however you want. Doesn't alter the premise.


The post in discussion is dripping with back door agenda.

There are aspects of the post I have not mentioned and I don't want to get into in this football thread.

I'll end with this... it's better to stay on point when discussing CTE... more likely to result in reasonable conclusions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 10:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:20 pm
Posts: 2197
He was found at an airport trying to fly back to Pittsburgh.

He's got a baby here in Pittsburgh.

It's entirely possible he was homesick and couldn't handle being away from his child, something he's not really had to deal with for this long a time.

I mean it's not like he was confused and found at the end of a bridge. He might just be at a point where he wants to go home and be with his family....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 8883
If that is the case jaybird, I'm relieved he isn't facing a medical crisis, but that kind of conduct is not normal. I just hope he's alright.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:22 pm
Posts: 2406
If you read between the lines it's obvious that something happened that made him mad, he flew home to visit his kid, reported back and now the team is making him get a mental health eval before he plays again.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 1678
dropemjaybird wrote:
He was found at an airport trying to fly back to Pittsburgh.

He's got a baby here in Pittsburgh.

It's entirely possible he was homesick and couldn't handle being away from his child, something he's not really had to deal with for this long a time.

I mean it's not like he was confused and found at the end of a bridge. He might just be at a point where he wants to go home and be with his family....

Or there are some issues going on with the kid (hopefully that's not the case). Remember Aaron Smith?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 1678
Orangesteel wrote:
If that is the case jaybird, I'm relieved he isn't facing a medical crisis, but that kind of conduct is not normal. I just hope he's alright.

Not sure how you can say that the conduct is "not normal" when we know virtually nothing about what happened.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:22 pm
Posts: 2406
Pabst wrote:
dropemjaybird wrote:
He was found at an airport trying to fly back to Pittsburgh.

He's got a baby here in Pittsburgh.

It's entirely possible he was homesick and couldn't handle being away from his child, something he's not really had to deal with for this long a time.

I mean it's not like he was confused and found at the end of a bridge. He might just be at a point where he wants to go home and be with his family....

Or there are some issues going on with the kid (hopefully that's not the case). Remember Aaron Smith?


Doesn't really fit with the narrative and there's no reason he'd have to sneak away if that was the case.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 2648
Havoc wrote:
VanWilder wrote:
Not really, it's pretty on point.


Have you ever competed in anything dangerous after you left your mommas warm safe shelter at 18?

The post is a farce.


First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:47 am
Posts: 4238
VanWilder wrote:
Havoc wrote:
VanWilder wrote:
Not really, it's pretty on point.


Have you ever competed in anything dangerous after you left your mommas warm safe shelter at 18?

The post is a farce.


First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


Oh, I understand.

I object to the post as a whole on multiple grounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:20 pm
Posts: 2197
fortythree wrote:
Pabst wrote:
dropemjaybird wrote:
He was found at an airport trying to fly back to Pittsburgh.

He's got a baby here in Pittsburgh.

It's entirely possible he was homesick and couldn't handle being away from his child, something he's not really had to deal with for this long a time.

I mean it's not like he was confused and found at the end of a bridge. He might just be at a point where he wants to go home and be with his family....

Or there are some issues going on with the kid (hopefully that's not the case). Remember Aaron Smith?


Doesn't really fit with the narrative and there's no reason he'd have to sneak away if that was the case.


I mean, guy is at the airport waiting to board a plane to Pittsburgh where he has a baby daughter. I'm sure he didn't tell the team because he was acting on an impulse which can be very strong - especially considering this is really the first time he's playing football with a family that he's not essentially living with at the time.

Not to mention the team had spent the week in LA after being displaced after the hurricane... I'm sure Timmons saw teammates dealing with the stress of family and friends who live in the Miami region.

In terms of going awol... he left the team to try and take a plane to see his daughter... I don't think there is anything more here than that... it's not like he had a few hours of being lost on a street somewhere... I think it's pretty obvious what he was trying to do - and to be honest - it's somewhat understandable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:34 am
Posts: 5490
jaybird, you mean its not CTE every time an NFLer does something unusual???

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:36 pm
Posts: 597
VanWilder wrote:

First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


That's a little late to be breastfeeding, doncha think?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Posts: 3979
Lynch wrote:
VanWilder wrote:

First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


That's a little late to be breastfeeding, doncha think?


I'm 33 years old and I still get in a good suck or two a year. Mainly reserved for family reunions since she lives a state away.

_________________
SteelThrillsseeker wrote:
Dad showed up after work and according to her the entire hospital hears my dad yell you are not naming our son Hoss.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:37 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:12 pm
Posts: 481
TB wrote:
Lynch wrote:
VanWilder wrote:

First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


That's a little late to be breastfeeding, doncha think?


I'm 33 years old and I still get in a good suck or two a year. Mainly reserved for family reunions since she lives a state away.

:D

_________________
"All for ourselves and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind." - Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 2648
Lynch wrote:
VanWilder wrote:

First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


That's a little late to be breastfeeding, doncha think?


Further evidence of the pussification of breast feeders, lol.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 1678
Dolphins have suspended Timmons indefinitely, per Schefter and Rapoport

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 1443
Would love them to cut him so he could return home where he belongs - and wants to be apparently. He would def improve our ILB room.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 6314
TB wrote:
Lynch wrote:
VanWilder wrote:

First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


That's a little late to be breastfeeding, doncha think?


I'm 33 years old and I still get in a good suck or two a year. Mainly reserved for family reunions since she lives a state away.
Classic SF. I spit my drink with that one. Had to clean my screen.

_________________
"I wish Fraudlin would get testicular cancer and die after he watches me anally penetrate his wife."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:35 pm
Posts: 7595
TB wrote:
Lynch wrote:
VanWilder wrote:

First, I stopped sucking Moms teet at 15. Second, yes. If you're too obtuse to understand what he was saying, I'm not going to waste time explaining it.


That's a little late to be breastfeeding, doncha think?


I'm 33 years old and I still get in a good suck or two a year. Mainly reserved for family reunions since she lives a state away.

Aw, dude....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 8883
Pabst wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
If that is the case jaybird, I'm relieved he isn't facing a medical crisis, but that kind of conduct is not normal. I just hope he's alright.

Not sure how you can say that the conduct is "not normal" when we know virtually nothing about what happened.


Not normal as in he was here for almost a decade and never did anything to this level (as in bailing on your team before it’s opening game). So yeah, not normal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 8883
And again, I’m not saying the dude is mental. I’m saying I hope he is alright. Some of you are more agenda driven than you think.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:45 pm 
My guess is this

The Dolphins while far from the worst are a team in near constant flux. No job is safe. No job is seen as even somewhat insulated from debate at any time.

The coaches/staff/fo cant possibly remain calm cool and collected in that, therefore its a constant must win right now environment coupled with an ncaa like coaching staff mentality of i am god do what i say or else.

LT for his part chaffed at that coming from Pittsburgh. IMO he always had some generally well meaning but silent killer in him and it was never pushed to a breaking point in Pittsburgh. Perhaps it was even channelled.

Im overly critical of this team sometimes. Usuallly good form and steady dillegence pay off in the long run. Winners focus on that at the expense of maybes in the shortrun


Last edited by SteelerChef on Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:22 am
Posts: 8883
What?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 2648
Not buying the culture shock argument STD.

I'm going to wait & see, he was one of my favorite players.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 6875
SteelerChef wrote:
My guess is this

The Dolphins while far from the worst are a team in near constant flux. No job is safe. No job is seen as even somewhat insulated from debate at any time.

The coaches/staff/fo cant possibly remain calm cool and collected in that, therefore its a constant must win right now environment coupled with an ncaa like coaching staff mentality of i am god do what i say or else.

LT for his part chaffed at that coming from Pittsburgh. IMO he always had some generally well meaning but silent killer in him and it was never pushed to a breaking point in Pittsburgh. Perhaps it was even channelled.

Im overly critical of this team sometimes. Usuallly good form and steady dillegence pay off in the long run. Winners focus on that at the expense of maybes in the shortrun

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 2:00 am
Posts: 1190
Location: Hawaii
Fins traded for LB Anthony of Saints for 2018 pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:23 pm
Posts: 3260
Dolphins suspended Timmons indefinitely.

I read somewhere that the reason he tried to get on a flight to PA was because there was some issue with his baby mama or baby.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:36 pm
Posts: 597
Orangesteel wrote:
Pabst wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:
If that is the case jaybird, I'm relieved he isn't facing a medical crisis, but that kind of conduct is not normal. I just hope he's alright.

Not sure how you can say that the conduct is "not normal" when we know virtually nothing about what happened.


Not normal as in he was here for almost a decade and never did anything to this level (as in bailing on your team before it’s opening game). So yeah, not normal.


Dude... we gotta guy talkin about sucking his mom's tits @ age 15, and you choose to define a Timmons trip home as abnormal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 1678
Interesting comment from a Dolphins beat writer:

Quote:
Two lessons here: 1) Don’t pick up Pittsburgh’s aging players. Joey Porter, Mike Wallace and now Timmons. Enough said? The Steelers know when to get rid of players; 2) You don’t guaranteed $11 million in a $12 million deal in the NFL – even to a player who looks rock-solid. That’s a lot of guaranteed money for a guy on the other side of 30 coming to an entirely new organization in a sport where people age fast.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/dave-hyde-blog/fl-sp-hyde5-timmons-anthony-20170919-story.html

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Slightly OT: Timmons
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:07 am
Posts: 8350
Holy shit STDchef :P :lol:

It's time

Image

_________________
ImageImage
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group