It is currently Tue Oct 17, 2017 4:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 8335
SteelerChef wrote:
To be fair....a total bs call....BUT...that 2 pt call was worse...lol...i will take it...lol


I thought the elbow was clearly down before the ball broke the plain.

Maybe Tomlin is actually an evil genius that doesn't put teams away because he's just a company man.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:55 pm
Posts: 889
Personally felt like it was the right call, but shouldn’t have been overturned due to how subjective it was.

Looked to me like AB was bobbling the ball most of the way through the catch. He had control for a brief second before the defender’s arm knocked it sideways again, but that’s not enough to establish possession.

Again, my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:18 pm
Posts: 8759
SteelerChef wrote:
To be fair....a total bs call....BUT...that 2 pt call was worse...lol...i will take it...lol

I agree..i thought raven was in...I thought it must be make up call for the 3 points they shafted us on brown bs call.. how can these bums look at shit for 10 minites and still fuck it up 50 percet of time..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:45 pm
Posts: 10836
How come no one can be 100% sure of what is defined as a catch anymore? Was a horseshit call and unfortunately for the refs/nfl and the rats it didn't matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 8335
Steelafan77 wrote:
How come no one can be 100% sure of what is defined as a catch anymore? Was a horseshit call and unfortunately for the refs/nfl and the rats it didn't matter.


We all know what a catch is. Everyone has since they were 10 years old playing neighborhood games in your backyard.

But the rules allow the NFL to shape games in a way that keeps people watching. And I'll quit following it all when Ben retires.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Posts: 2682
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Personally felt like it was the right call, but shouldn’t have been overturned due to how subjective it was.

Looked to me like AB was bobbling the ball most of the way through the catch. He had control for a brief second before the defender’s arm knocked it sideways again, but that’s not enough to establish possession.

Again, my opinion.


That’s where I’m at. I thought he was bobbling it prior to his knee hitting down. Still can’t believe they reversed the call on the field, but I understand it.

As for the two pointer, it looked like the left elbow hit down and before the ball crossed. He had the ball tucked back near his hip as he was going down. Tough call, but I think they got it right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 8335
TB wrote:
Still can’t believe they reversed the call on the field


Yes to everything else, but especially that. THAT is everything. End of story.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:18 pm
Posts: 8759
I thought neither justified over turn..and they wasted 20 min..but this is new nfl and its shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Posts: 4819
Kodiak wrote:
SteelerChef wrote:
To be fair....a total bs call....BUT...that 2 pt call was worse...lol...i will take it...lol


I thought the elbow was clearly down before the ball broke the plain.

Maybe Tomlin is actually an evil genius that doesn't put teams away because he's just a company man.
Plane.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AB Int. Now you have to account for something called "Ti
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:54 pm
Posts: 3068
The "INT" was a joke. He had possession all the way until his knee hit. Just because the ball moves slightly as you have possession doesn't negate possession. It's not like there was a bobble.

The 2 point conversion was the right call. People were looking at his hip. If you look at elbow the ball was short.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dd131005, Google [Bot] and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group