It is currently Fri Nov 24, 2017 7:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 5814
SP wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
You know he had 4 tackles vs the run on Sunday night, right?

First four all season. That's the problem.


But it's an improvement

He ain't no Artie Choke

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 13895
I'm merely saying he didn't avoid contact this week, so either he's feeling better or someone coached him, or something.

_________________
Whatever it takes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 744
A lot of people including myself have been calling for years for corners that cover first and tackle second.
Burns can cover, I’m good with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 105
He only makes the tackle when no one else is around and he's forced to do it. That's not going to cut it against superior teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:11 pm
Posts: 1452
cop1211 wrote:
A lot of people including myself have been calling for years for corners that cover first and tackle second.
Burns can cover, I’m good with that.


You're wrong. I want a leather helmet, sweater wearing, 1940's Grabowski that can break ribs, lost his nose in the war and runs a 5.4 40.

No...I'm wrong. Fuck Colbert for not drafting one, but TWO Rod Woodsons in the last 3 years.

No no...it's all wrong...bring back Cockrell and bench Burns. Ross could tackle the shit out guys between torchings.

_________________

Ultimately, America's answer to the intolerant man is diversity, the very diversity which our heritage of religious freedom has inspired.


Robert F. Kennedy...50 years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 105
What's so unusual about covering the pass and tackling? If the pass is completed, you still have to tackle or stop the run. Elite QB's will pick him apart.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 8900
ChicagoSteel wrote:
Fuck Colbert for not drafting one, but TWO Rod Woodsons in the last 3 years.


?? :shock: ??

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 7:14 pm
Posts: 1263
I am disappointed in Burns this year. I expected a big jump from his rookie year to year two. I don't see it.

Everybody was so down on Ross Cockrell, calling him soft, can't play the run, not physical enough and yet Burns is playing softer than Cockrell ever did. Just don't understand it. And it isn't like he is this shut down CB who you can say hey, we drafted him to be a stud coverage guy. Where are the INTs? The broken up passes? Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.

When we played Cincy and I got my first chance to watch William Jackson the 3rd, it was eye opening. So, that is what a first round CB is supposed to perform like, tight coverage, playing the catch point, knocking the football out of Antonio Brown's hands. Yes! What we have in Burns in nowhere close to that, and may never be.

I don't know what this season would have been like without Mike Hilton and Joe Haden. If we had gone into this season with Burns, Cockrell and Gay as our trio, we might be lucky to be 4-4.

If people are honest, the two weakest performers on defense are which two players? For me that is Burns and Mitchell. They are the two biggest weaknesses that teams exploit and it isn't even close. One we spent a first round pick on and the other we signed to a 5 year $25 million contract. Not really getting a good return on those investments.

_________________
The Steelers have a greater chance of finding a Unicorn, or a Sasquatch, or the Loch Ness Monster than they do in finding another great 3-4 OLB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:01 am
Posts: 8900
Scunge wrote:
Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.


To be fair, both are arguably hamstrung by the cushions our defense loves. But Haden being a better match-up for us on #2 receivers doesn't make him bettern than Burns on #1's. Both also have Mike Mitchell having their backs, and like you said....

Burns has gotten beat, and has not been as good as hoped. But I don't think he's been bad by any stretch.

_________________
------------------------------------------------------


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Artie "Wiffs" Burns
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 5773
Scunge wrote:
I am disappointed in Burns this year. I expected a big jump from his rookie year to year two. I don't see it.

Everybody was so down on Ross Cockrell, calling him soft, can't play the run, not physical enough and yet Burns is playing softer than Cockrell ever did. Just don't understand it. And it isn't like he is this shut down CB who you can say hey, we drafted him to be a stud coverage guy. Where are the INTs? The broken up passes? Seems like QBs are targeting him more because Haden is that CB that we want Burns to be, they avoid Haden and throw more at Burns.

When we played Cincy and I got my first chance to watch William Jackson the 3rd, it was eye opening. So, that is what a first round CB is supposed to perform like, tight coverage, playing the catch point, knocking the football out of Antonio Brown's hands. Yes! What we have in Burns in nowhere close to that, and may never be.

I don't know what this season would have been like without Mike Hilton and Joe Haden. If we had gone into this season with Burns, Cockrell and Gay as our trio, we might be lucky to be 4-4.

If people are honest, the two weakest performers on defense are which two players? For me that is Burns and Mitchell. They are the two biggest weaknesses that teams exploit and it isn't even close. One we spent a first round pick on and the other we signed to a 5 year $25 million contract. Not really getting a good return on those investments.

Agreed. I laugh when people call Burns a shutdown corner...not even close.

_________________
"They're standing around, Butz!" - Kevin O'Shea


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], JackSplat58, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group