It is currently Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 791
http://www.espn.com/blog/pittsburgh-steelers/post/_/id/25895/steelers-ready-to-evolve-with-man-coverage-but-which-qbs-are-left

Bring it, don't sing it. We'll see how things pan out, but I would have been using more man concepts all trough the season to prepare to use it against the good teams - not break it out now that you are playing a better team. If you don't use it often, how are you to know what you have with it? Honestly, now that some of the more prominent QB's have fallen, I doubt that Tomlin and Co. make the shift and they will be ill-prepared to match up against Brady - again!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:57 pm
Posts: 2543
I will be interested to see if Allen is not activated vs NE. He has the size to cover Gronk.

_________________
So here’s the thing about watching game tape: it’s only as useful as the asshole watching it. - Drew Magary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:20 am
Posts: 4344
Be nice to see if Sutton and or Allen can enter the mix on defense.

_________________
"Tomlin doubled down on dumb" JackSplat58


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 102
Stafford completed 85% of his passes against cover 2/3 which the D was in 80% of the time. Completely ineffective. Zone blitz and pattern worked. Time to try something different.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:19 am
Posts: 7983
I don't get the whole, we're doing man coverage in practice thing, so we'll be fine.

I don't believe for a second that the secondary is going to be able to just flip a switch and go man against the Pats if they have not had sufficient in-game experience doing it.

_________________
Frank Sinatra, Jr. 'Black Night'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jdwl7X6Jruo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:33 pm
Posts: 13893
Key to it not working vs Detroit or NE last year is pass rush sucked. I think second problem is that Mitchell and Golden and Gay suck in man, so you have to hope newer guys are going to get integrated more so that you have the right bodies on the field.

_________________
Whatever it takes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:57 pm
Posts: 2543
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Key to it not working vs Detroit or NE last year is pass rush sucked. I think second problem is that Mitchell and Golden and Gay suck in man, so you have to hope newer guys are going to get integrated more so that you have the right bodies on the field.


^^THIS^^ when Gay is on the field they know he is playing a zone.

_________________
So here’s the thing about watching game tape: it’s only as useful as the asshole watching it. - Drew Magary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:11 pm
Posts: 1627
Still Lit wrote:
I don't get the whole, we're doing man coverage in practice thing, so we'll be fine.

I don't believe for a second that the secondary is going to be able to just flip a switch and go man against the Pats if they have not had sufficient in-game experience doing it.


This was the whole excuse for not implementing it last year, is that they hadn't used it all season. You'd have to think they'd test it out at some point before the playoffs. But, "we do what we do"... :roll:

Don't want to put too much on tape... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:46 pm
Posts: 1246
Saw where the Steelers run zone coverages more than 80% of the time. That’s way higher than most teams.

The reason of course is this

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wBlaB-SiKaQ

_________________
Three's a charm. #StanleyCup
-- Pittsburgh Penguins (@penguins) June 12, 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "Man" coverage coming?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 1233
JackSplat58 wrote:
Still Lit wrote:
I don't get the whole, we're doing man coverage in practice thing, so we'll be fine.

I don't believe for a second that the secondary is going to be able to just flip a switch and go man against the Pats if they have not had sufficient in-game experience doing it.


This was the whole excuse for not implementing it last year, is that they hadn't used it all season. You'd have to think they'd test it out at some point before the playoffs. But, "we do what we do"... :roll:

Don't want to put too much on tape... :roll:

Well, the next 5 games are against the #23, 27, 21, 28, and 31st ranked passing offenses in the NFL. If they're going to test out new wrinkles in pass coverage, now would be an ideal time.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group