It is currently Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:31 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:02 am 
I'm not impressed with the success rate of NFL front offices in the draft. I 100% believe there are many "armchair" GMs that could do a better job then many general managers. No bullshit...I've listened to many GMs and many HCs over the years and while it's getting better there are message board guys who I'm sure have a better understanding of things. I haven't researched how true it is but it seems the best teams are the ones that find value in the back end of the draft a few years in a row.

I think very good personnel guys mostly have about a 10 year peak shelf life then it's gone...the great unifying theory of life...if you are really lucky you have "it" for a while mostly when you are under 40 then it's gone. There are exceptions...but I recall reading analysis a couple years back on age and a short peak at the top of a profession and it seems to relate to both science and the arts...perhaps the age of 50 might work better for athletic talent evaluation.

I really doubt there is the consensus within any organization on draft picks many here seem to believe exists. It isn't a democracy. Just consider the clashes in the PS organization over some of the selections in some of the greatest drafts in history. Final board is set by Tomlin/Colbert and everyone gets on board.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:06 pm
Posts: 4208
Old Fashioned wrote:
SteelerzEdsaL7 wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
considering the last time they fired management it was the architect of the greatest drafts in NFL history AND his brother, to bot... maybe it's good they don't fire management.

I dunno-- was Donahoe management? That was a good firing.


Yup he was Cowher;s grocery clerk.


I thought he worked in a bank.


Alluded to Brando in Apocalypse Now, not Dimitrius the DB

_________________
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:16 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 7007
Zivco wrote:
I'm not impressed with the success rate of NFL front offices in the draft. I 100% believe there are many "armchair" GMs that could do a better job then many general managers. No bullshit...I've listened to many GMs and many HCs over the years and while it's getting better there are message board guys who I'm sure have a better understanding of things. I haven't researched how true it is but it seems the best teams are the ones that find value in the back end of the draft a few years in a row.

I think very good personnel guys mostly have about a 10 year peak shelf life then it's gone...the great unifying theory of life...if you are really lucky you have "it" for a while mostly when you are under 40 then it's gone. There are exceptions...but I recall reading analysis a couple years back on age and a short peak at the top of a profession and it seems to relate to both science and the arts...perhaps the age of 50 might work better for athletic talent evaluation.

I really doubt there is the consensus within any organization on draft picks many here seem to believe exists. It isn't a democracy. Just consider the clashes in the PS organization over some of the selections in some of the greatest drafts in history. Final board is set by Tomlin/Colbert and everyone gets on board.


Tell me where these armchair GMs would be getting their info and research to do a better job than those actually employed by NFL teams to perform that function.

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:14 am
Posts: 2443
Location: Houston, TX
BarryFoster wrote:
Tell me where these armchair GMs would be getting their info and research to do a better job than those actually employed by NFL teams to perform that function.


Irrelevant if you dont use your information to make the right decisions.

Regularly, round 1 proves that.

_________________
R S wrote:
I'm sure she still wakes up in cold sweats and night terrors of Peyton's wrinkly ball sack pitter-pattering on her forehead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 10:23 am 
BarryFoster wrote:
Tell me where these armchair GMs would be getting their info and research to do a better job than those actually employed by NFL teams to perform that function.


There is a ton of college footage on the net. Senior Bowl and combine are months of coverage. Pro days are covered down to whether the GF spit or swallowed the previous evening. I think names on lottery balls would work better for the Jags, Skins, Raiders, etc...plenty of examples of non professionals out performing those that are paid in every industry...I would guess everyone who has ever started a successful business have had the same doubts from the "paid professionals", bankers, and the fans of big corporate whores for the homogenization, franchising, and monopolization of all things.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:40 pm
Posts: 3187
Zivco wrote:
BarryFoster wrote:
Tell me where these armchair GMs would be getting their info and research to do a better job than those actually employed by NFL teams to perform that function.


There is a ton of college footage on the net. Senior Bowl and combine are months of coverage. Pro days are covered down to whether the GF spit or swallowed the previous evening. I think names on lottery balls would work better for the Jags, Skins, Raiders, etc...plenty of examples of non professionals out performing those that are paid in every industry...I would guess everyone who has ever started a successful business have had the same doubts from the "paid professionals", bankers, and the fans of big corporate whores for the homogenization, franchising, and monopolization of all things.


PS drafted with a blindfold. O pro days? My bad you mean the stage were Shazier showed greater athletic skills than matched/bettered anyone in the entire draft? Shame his production doesnt match the highlight reel olympics in shorts. Yep being top 2 in TFLs in last 2 years what the fuck! If only he looked good in a Saban D and was a captain n stuff. Who knows if he got consistently blown by SEC commentary he might fit the bill. Especially when shown up in big games...like Auburn. :roll: Meet Mr. Zivco, the not only dont I like the draft pick but I'm openly hoping he fails so I can play chest thump on the internet. I dont give a damn what any other posters think of you.

Ive seen enough, I made a concerted effort to avoid the negativity you favored and reasoned it with well he seems a bright lad. You are but you are also agenda driven so much it is chronic. You dont give a toss how this team does you care far more about being able to crow over a pre-disposition advocating team failure. Good for you. In my experience that doesnt make you a fan, it makes you a zealot for brownie points. Ive no doubt you'll respond with the usual word salad drudgery, others will no doubt nod, not I, I prefer my dram and the ignore button.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 12:21 am 
steelclan wrote:
PS drafted with a blindfold. O pro days? My bad you mean the stage were Shazier showed greater athletic skills than matched/bettered anyone in the entire draft?


I don't know where this shit comes from. I wasn't speaking to e.t.in the quote. As to his workout numbers there were at least a half dozen LBs with better agility and reps numbers...and he didn't participate in the 40..

steelclan wrote:
If only he looked good in a Saban D and was a captain n stuff.


I don't have a clue how you associate me with Alabama players. Mosely is the first Saban player I have advocated to go to the PS. If you think "Saban turns out used up, finished products" I think you're a fucking idiot. Each player is unique.

steelclan wrote:
Especially when shown up in big games...like Auburn.


You really have no fucking clue do you? First, it was a good game vs Mosely. Second, that's a unique offense, it's not going to be evaluated as typical know matter who is playing Auburn.

steelclan wrote:
Meet Mr. Zivco, the not only dont I like the draft pick but I'm openly hoping he fails so I can play chest thump on the internet. I dont give a damn what any other posters think of you.


steelclan wrote:
Ive seen enough


Look I'll bet I've logged more then twice the number of PS games then you have. I don't do victory laps nor do I start or flood threads with my opinions. The only reason I'm taking the time to respond to this is terrier and rat amusement.

steelclan wrote:
You are but you are also agenda driven so much it is chronic. You dont give a toss how this team does you care far more about being able to crow over a pre-disposition advocating team failure.


No agenda. I want to be right. I've not advocated for team failure in any way. I was at Division winner prior to the draft. I've had worst case days that look like 6-10. Right now...8-8...again.

steelclan wrote:
I prefer my dram and the ignore button.


Figured you were umbrellas and fruity skewers...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 1:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:17 pm
Posts: 1123
Shazier hasn't played a down and people are up in arms about the pick. People hated the Timmons pick and he has become an elite LB in this league, no matter what you believe or try to overanalyze.

Timmons gets a lot of blame on this site and all his done is shown up and played. Your ILBs are asked to do more than just stop the run these days. I believe that explosive players who can cover that middle of the field like Shazier stop,those crazy RB dump offs and continued TE seam rapings. Speed allows the cross dogs to actually get there. Heck now blitzes can truly come from anywhere. Front 7 looks like it could get our swagger back.

_________________
No matter what anyone says, no matter the excuse or explanation, whatever a person does, in the end, is what he intended to do all along- Cus D'Amato


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:04 am 
VeritasSteel wrote:
Timmons gets a lot of blame on this site and all his done is shown up and played


I'm not close to Timmons largest critic...but it is ridiculous what we are paying him. He is the largest ILB cap hit in the NFL...and over the last few years we get something like 3.5 sacks, 3 pass defensed, 3 tackles for loss, 2 picks, and inconsistent play vs the run...I think his average PFF rating over the contract is 12 ILB...Can't pay 10 million + for that.

VeritasSteel wrote:
I believe that explosive players who can cover that middle of the field like Shazier stop,those crazy RB dump offs and continued TE seam rapings.


Shaz has one career int at OSU. 4 passes defensed last year. And his angles...even to the flat...are horrible.

VeritasSteel wrote:
. Speed allows the cross dogs to actually get there. Heck now blitzes can truly come from anywhere.


Shaz is not a def win when isolated on a rb in pass pro on the blitz....he often fell down simply by contacting a linemen hip or leg on the blitz.

VeritasSteel wrote:
Front 7 looks like it could get our swagger back.


I don't give a shit about swagger...21 in rush defense and you have some swishy mfers on the field.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 1890
steelclan wrote:
Zivco wrote:
BarryFoster wrote:
Tell me where these armchair GMs would be getting their info and research to do a better job than those actually employed by NFL teams to perform that function.


There is a ton of college footage on the net. Senior Bowl and combine are months of coverage. Pro days are covered down to whether the GF spit or swallowed the previous evening. I think names on lottery balls would work better for the Jags, Skins, Raiders, etc...plenty of examples of non professionals out performing those that are paid in every industry...I would guess everyone who has ever started a successful business have had the same doubts from the "paid professionals", bankers, and the fans of big corporate whores for the homogenization, franchising, and monopolization of all things.


PS drafted with a blindfold. O pro days? My bad you mean the stage were Shazier showed greater athletic skills than matched/bettered anyone in the entire draft? Shame his production doesnt match the highlight reel olympics in shorts. Yep being top 2 in TFLs in last 2 years what the fuck! If only he looked good in a Saban D and was a captain n stuff. Who knows if he got consistently blown by SEC commentary he might fit the bill. Especially when shown up in big games...like Auburn. :roll: Meet Mr. Zivco, the not only dont I like the draft pick but I'm openly hoping he fails so I can play chest thump on the internet. I dont give a damn what any other posters think of you.

Ive seen enough, I made a concerted effort to avoid the negativity you favored and reasoned it with well he seems a bright lad. You are but you are also agenda driven so much it is chronic. You dont give a toss how this team does you care far more about being able to crow over a pre-disposition advocating team failure. Good for you. In my experience that doesnt make you a fan, it makes you a zealot for brownie points. Ive no doubt you'll respond with the usual word salad drudgery, others will no doubt nod, not I, I prefer my dram and the ignore button.


I like this post.

Can we at least give RS a chance before crucifying him? Holy fuck. Was i suprised when the Steelers selected him? Yes. Am i hoping he succeeds? Yes. Some here are openly hoping he fails, which i think is fucked up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:15 am 
Luca Brasi wrote:
Can we at least give RS a chance before crucifying him? Holy fuck. Was i suprised when the Steelers selected him? Yes. Am i hoping he succeeds? Yes. Some here are openly hoping he fails, which i think is fucked up.


No doubt I'm the largest critic. I'm not hoping he fails. I'm being crystal clear on my opinion of his tape. We are 8-8 twice in a row...I find irrational exuberance and cheerleader like optimism much more off putting then the mediocre truth. I will obviously live or die with this opinion and I trust what I saw on tape.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:12 pm
Posts: 1758
Whether it was the OP's intention or not, this thread invited Zivco. Zivco does not like Shazier. He didn't like him prior to the Steelers drafting him. It was well documented to say the least before the recent board crash.

You guys that are sooo upset about Zivco's opinion on the player are hilarious. Clean the sand out of your vaginas.

_________________
Get well soon, Matt Murray


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:17 pm
Posts: 1123
Zivco wrote:
VeritasSteel wrote:
Timmons gets a lot of blame on this site and all his done is shown up and played


I'm not close to Timmons largest critic...but it is ridiculous what we are paying him. He is the largest ILB cap hit in the NFL...and over the last few years we get something like 3.5 sacks, 3 pass defensed, 3 tackles for loss, 2 picks, and inconsistent play vs the run...I think his average PFF rating over the contract is 12 ILB...Can't pay 10 million + for that.

VeritasSteel wrote:
I believe that explosive players who can cover that middle of the field like Shazier stop,those crazy RB dump offs and continued TE seam rapings.


Shaz has one career int at OSU. 4 passes defensed last year. And his angles...even to the flat...are horrible.

VeritasSteel wrote:
. Speed allows the cross dogs to actually get there. Heck now blitzes can truly come from anywhere.


Shaz is not a def win when isolated on a rb in pass pro on the blitz....he often fell down simply by contacting a linemen hip or leg on the blitz.

VeritasSteel wrote:
Front 7 looks like it could get our swagger back.


I don't give a shit about swagger...21 in rush defense and you have some swishy mfers on the field.


Did you think it was funny that foote was seeing a lot more action next to Timmons before he got hurt? If you were running an offense and you had a choice to put foote or Timmons on your RB or you want to ISO your TE on either who do you choose? Foote or whomever else is in there. So you throw numbers but you're not talking about what offenses see and what they scheme away from. We want numbers and information to justify our POV and most times miss nuances that people sometimes go a lifetime and never get.

I think that works into your comment on arm chair GMs. A guy making pics based on media outlets and scouring the internet is what the Bengals used to do. It's what the Browns do. Where is the success there. Bengals scouting department used to be 3 guys pretty much letting everyone else do the work, then just attending the combine and making picks on their best guesses. Not really effective.

The real value in having people who know talent and can see it no matter where it is, is it allows you to make better financial choices with your team. Many of us here would draft a guy because "Ben needs a weapon" when the entire defense is 2 years overdue for an overhaul. PS surprised many when TP came to this team and no one knew how dynamic he could be. If the same person who drafted him is saying he did it because he brings that same type of athleticism in a LBs body-- I'm at least going to observe him in a Pro Game before I consider him a bust. No one knew what Troy was capable of until he made plays in his first game and then our eyes were opened. Let's hope for the same thing from RS.

_________________
No matter what anyone says, no matter the excuse or explanation, whatever a person does, in the end, is what he intended to do all along- Cus D'Amato


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 11:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:40 pm
Posts: 3187
Y-Town Steel wrote:
Whether it was the OP's intention or not, this thread invited Zivco. Zivco does not like Shazier. He didn't like him prior to the Steelers drafting him. It was well documented to say the least before the recent board crash.

You guys that are sooo upset about Zivco's opinion on the player are hilarious. Clean the sand out of your vaginas.


Oh no! Not the man card! God help us, wouldnt want to be seen as not manly enough! I'll tell you what, I'll continue to call out posters that favor agendas and chest thumping above the team and just for you I'll don a tutu so you can grin ear to ear in your wife beater T collection.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:04 pm 
VeritasSteel wrote:
Did you think it was funny that foote was seeing a lot more action next to Timmons before he got hurt? If you were running an offense and you had a choice to put foote or Timmons on your RB or you want to ISO your TE on either who do you choose? Foote or whomever else is in there. So you throw numbers but you're not talking about what offenses see and what they scheme away from. We want numbers and information to justify our POV and most times miss nuances that people sometimes go a lifetime and never get.


I find it funny that you think old, rickety ass Foote was any sort of solution.

VeritasSteel wrote:
I think that works into your comment on arm chair GMs. A guy making pics based on media outlets and scouring the internet is what the Bengals used to do. It's what the Browns do. Where is the success there. Bengals scouting department used to be 3 guys pretty much letting everyone else do the work, then just attending the combine and making picks on their best guesses. Not really effective.


I want my HC having final word in all my shopping. My thoughts on armchair QBs doing a better job is exactly because of the franchises like the ones you mentioned...no matter how many are employed I think nearly every post 80s great team has had two or less decision makers. This idea that the PS scouting staff are equally weighted or take some sort of vote is ridiculous.

VeritasSteel wrote:
The real value in having people who know talent and can see it no matter where it is, is it allows you to make better financial choices with your team. Many of us here would draft a guy because "Ben needs a weapon" when the entire defense is 2 years overdue for an overhaul. PS surprised many when TP came to this team and no one knew how dynamic he could be. If the same person who drafted him is saying he did it because he brings that same type of athleticism in a LBs body-- I'm at least going to observe him in a Pro Game before I consider him a bust. No one knew what Troy was capable of until he made plays in his first game and then our eyes were opened. Let's hope for the same thing from RS.


It was very clear what I prioritized before the draft. I have called him many things...but not a bust.

steelclan wrote:
Oh no! Not the man card! God help us, wouldnt want to be seen as not manly enough! I'll tell you what, I'll continue to call out posters that favor agendas and chest thumping above the team and just for you I'll don a tutu so you can grin ear to ear in your wife beater T collection.


And I'll continue to think of you as sliding and whining....


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:28 pm
Posts: 4706
I'll never forget the meltdown in the chat room that Thursday night. It was absolutely legendary. Right up there with the Sac of Steel meltdown on the old site.

_________________
#CdnSteelerFanStrong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:21 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 7007
Zivco wrote:
Luca Brasi wrote:
Can we at least give RS a chance before crucifying him? Holy fuck. Was i suprised when the Steelers selected him? Yes. Am i hoping he succeeds? Yes. Some here are openly hoping he fails, which i think is fucked up.


No doubt I'm the largest critic. I'm not hoping he fails. I'm being crystal clear on my opinion of his tape. We are 8-8 twice in a row...I find irrational exuberance and cheerleader like optimism much more off putting then the mediocre truth. I will obviously live or die with this opinion and I trust what I saw on tape.


What you saw on tape? You mean his entire body of work to this point?

Wonder if they feel like he hasn't peaked yet?

Christ....if you're so good at evaluating talent send a resume into the Steelers.....you'd probably have to start at the bottom.....like pee wee football in Florida. ...but at least you would get your foot in the door.

_________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GflYTviOIag


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 7110
Obviously wrote:
I'll never forget the meltdown in the chat room that Thursday night. It was absolutely legendary. Right up there with the Sac of Steel meltdown on the old site.

Holy shit, Obviously...I am totally mesmerized by your sig pic(or whatever its called). I cant stop staring at her! :shock:

_________________
We're all in this together. This is a full-blown, four-alarm holiday emergency here. We're gonna press on, and we're gonna have the hap, hap, happiest Christmas since Bing Crosby tap-danced with Danny fucking Kaye. -Clark W. Griswald
#CdnSteelerFanStrong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:21 pm 
BarryFoster wrote:
Christ....if you're so good at evaluating talent send a resume into the Steelers.....you'd probably have to start at the bottom.....like pee wee football in Florida. ...but at least you would get your foot in the door.


I'm fine with just Jesus. The only reason I go to pee wee football games is to eyeball the cheerleaders. I understand the process...and my complete inability to access it at any level at this point...so my wisdom must be contained by this message board...it will hardly be the first time in human history that the process has denied greatness. Perhaps in the future someone stumbles across these words and it's all Kafka/Van Gogh/Galileo/Poe..


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:35 pm
Posts: 8318
Of course Clan is a manly man, he's Scottish. They throw boulders and telephone poles for fun.

_________________
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
--Voltaire

#CdnSteelerFanStrong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 1890
Zivco wrote:
BarryFoster wrote:
Christ....if you're so good at evaluating talent send a resume into the Steelers.....you'd probably have to start at the bottom.....like pee wee football in Florida. ...but at least you would get your foot in the door.


I'm fine with just Jesus. The only reason I go to pee wee football games is to eyeball the cheerleaders. I understand the process...and my complete inability to access it at any level at this point...so my wisdom must be contained by this message board...it will hardly be the first time in human history that the process has denied greatness. Perhaps in the future someone stumbles across these words and it's all Kafka/Van Gogh/Galileo/Poe..



You go to pee wee football games to eyeball pee wee cheerleaders?

I think, or hope you meant pee wee players moms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:07 pm 
Luca Brasi wrote:
You go to pee wee football games to eyeball pee wee cheerleaders?

I think, or hope you meant pee wee players moms.


I thought the humor was obvious. I'm straight up legal tender...never got the milf thing though...even thinking about it feels treacherous...much prefer 20 to 35 even though I'm 44...most of gen Xer broads are complete bitches at this point even if they weren't years ago...the later boomer broads had a much more indulgent, selfish, fun loving approach to their 40s then the current crop of cunts who have replaced the F in milf with an S as in slap...and anyway the bloom is gone and the thickening of gravity has taken a firm hold by 35...40 on rare occasion...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:17 pm
Posts: 1123
Zivco wrote:
I find it funny that you think old, rickety ass Foote was any sort of solution.


What is funny is that your read that in there in an attempt to be--- funny. What I said was Foote was making plays and having a career year because teams were forcing him to make plays because they were scheming away from Timmons.

Zivco wrote:
I want my HC having final word in all my shopping. My thoughts on armchair QBs doing a better job is exactly because of the franchises like the ones you mentioned...no matter how many are employed I think nearly every post 80s great team has had two or less decision makers. This idea that the PS scouting staff are equally weighted or take some sort of vote is ridiculous.


If you are having the HC make the final word, why even have a GM? Thats kind of a pussy way out. Then you can blame the coach for signing off on the pick. Coaches can suggest but as Parcells famously said "They arent letting us pick out the groceries" You ask your scouting department to go find guys and analyze them and give you information, youre not giving them a say in making the pick.

Zivco wrote:
It was very clear what I prioritized before the draft. I have called him many things...but not a bust.


So what did you prioritize before the draft? What were your reasons for these priorities? Did they allow for team scheme, personality, ability to sign this guy in the future, and the current and future cap implications?

We can dance around words and its your right to be critical of the pick. But you have been the most vocal in your critique based on opinion and relying your layman skills as a talent evaluator.No one can say he's going to be this or that, until he is or isnt making plays in games. Which is my point.

_________________
No matter what anyone says, no matter the excuse or explanation, whatever a person does, in the end, is what he intended to do all along- Cus D'Amato


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:34 am 
VeritasSteel wrote:
What is funny is that your read that in there in an attempt to be--- funny. What I said was Foote was making plays and having a career year because teams were forcing him to make plays because they were scheming away from Timmons.


Foote played about a half game last season.

VeritasSteel wrote:
If you are having the HC make the final word, why even have a GM? Thats kind of a pussy way out. Then you can blame the coach for signing off on the pick. Coaches can suggest but as Parcells famously said "They arent letting us pick out the groceries" You ask your scouting department to go find guys and analyze them and give you information, youre not giving them a say in making the pick.


I think most of the staff is superfluous. I think it's the HC and GM that make the decision. I'm sure they have watched all the tape as well. I'm sure they listen to what others have to say about the picks. But ultimately only one guy can determine the pick...I want it to be the HC. It's his ass that's most on the line. Ultimately I believe that's what the situation is in Pittsburgh...as Tomlin has been quoted as having at least as much power in the draft as Colbert. I think mostly all SB winning HC's have that sort of authority.

VeritasSteel wrote:
So what did you prioritize before the draft? What were your reasons for these priorities? Did they allow for team scheme, personality, ability to sign this guy in the future, and the current and future cap implications?


I was clearly OT, ILB, CB. My first round OT's were gone...I would have selected Mosely. TP at ILB 50% of second half season snaps is plenty of reason. I obviously accounted for scheme and Saban called Mosely "the smartest player he ever coached". Contract 2 considerations are nonsense at the fail rate and I don't think there has been a hold out since the rookie cap.

VeritasSteel wrote:
We can dance around words and its your right to be critical of the pick. But you have been the most vocal in your critique based on opinion and relying your layman skills as a talent evaluator.No one can say he's going to be this or that, until he is or isnt making plays in games. Which is my point.


I don't label anyone a bust until year 3. This was a horrible pick. My "layman" skills seem to be doing better then the "experts" big boards the past 5 seasons. We'll see in August...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Shazier guy, or not?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:36 pm
Posts: 3565
Zivco wrote:
I don't label anyone a bust until year 3. This was a horrible pick. My "layman" skills seem to be doing better then the "experts" big boards the past 5 seasons. We'll see in August...


Yeah, Veritas, get it right! He's not a bust (yet), just a horrible pick! :roll:

Where's the documentation to support this claim that you've been "doing better then the experts" at evaluating draft prospects for the past five years?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BarryFoster and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
FORUM RULES --- PRIVACY POLICY




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group